Literature DB >> 12850615

Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia.

Beth A Plunkett1, Alex Lin, Cynthia A Wong, William A Grobman, Alan M Peaceman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if waiting for a strong urge to push in nulliparas with continuous low-concentration epidural analgesia shortens the pushing duration in the second stage.
METHODS: Nulliparas with standardized patient-controlled epidural analgesia (0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg/mL) were randomly assigned to pushing immediately upon complete cervical dilatation (n = 85) or waiting for a strong urge to push (n = 117). Urge to push and patient satisfaction were quantified on 100-mm visual analogue scales. Duration of pushing and total duration of the second stage were analyzed as survival time data.
RESULTS: Women who delayed pushing and those who pushed immediately were similar with respect to maternal characteristics. Women who delayed pushing had a stronger urge to push (P <.01) and a longer second stage (P <.05) than women who pushed immediately. There was no significant difference in the time spent pushing (median 57 versus 62 minutes, respectively) or the median level of patient satisfaction (80 mm for both groups). There were no significant differences in the overall rates of cesarean delivery (6% versus 12%, respectively), cesarean delivery during the second stage (2% in each group), spontaneous vaginal delivery (70% versus 69%, respectively), or neonatal or maternal morbidity.
CONCLUSION: In nulliparas with continuous low-concentration epidural analgesia, delaying pushing until a strong urge is felt does not reduce the duration of pushing in the second stage of labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12850615     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00479-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.

Authors:  Andrea Lemos; Melania Mr Amorim; Armele Dornelas de Andrade; Ariani I de Souza; José Eulálio Cabral Filho; Jailson B Correia
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-26

2.  Medical and nonmedical factors influencing utilization of delayed pushing in the second stage.

Authors:  Heather A Frey; Methodius G Tuuli; Sarah Cortez; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly A Roehl; Anthony L Shanks; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between delayed and immediate pushing in the second stage of vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Li-Ting Szu; Pao-Yu Chou; Pu-Hung Lin; Chiehfeng Chen; Wei-Lin Lin; Kee-Hsin Chen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  Postpartum urinary incontinence and birth outcomes as a result of the pushing technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katsuko Shinozaki; Maiko Suto; Erika Ota; Hiromi Eto; Shigeko Horiuchi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.932

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.