Literature DB >> 12850608

Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilization.

Jay M Cooper1, Charles S Carignan, Daniel Cher, John F Kerin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, effectiveness, and reliability of a tubal occlusion microinsert for permanent contraception, as well as to document patient recovery from the placement procedure and overall patient satisfaction.
METHODS: A cohort of 518 previously fertile women seeking sterilization participated in this prospective, phase III, international, multicenter trial. Microinsert placement was attempted in 507 women. Microinserts were placed bilaterally into the proximal fallopian tube lumens under hysteroscopic visualization in outpatient procedures.
RESULTS: Bilateral placement of the microinsert was achieved in 464 (92%) of 507 women. The most common reasons for failure to achieve satisfactory placement were tubal obstruction and stenosis or difficult access to the proximal tubal lumen. More than half of the women rated the average pain during the procedure as either mild or none, and 88% rated tolerance of device placement procedure as good to excellent. Average time to discharge was 80 minutes. Sixty percent of women returned to normal function within 1 day or less, and 92% missed 1 day or less of work. Three months after placement, correct microinsert placement and tubal occlusion were confirmed in 96% and 92% of cases, respectively. Comfort was rated as good to excellent by 99% of women at all follow-up visits. Ultimately, 449 of 518 women (87%) could rely on the microinsert for permanent contraception. After 9620 woman-months of exposure to intercourse, no pregnancies have been recorded.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hysteroscopic interval tubal sterilization with microinserts is well tolerated and results in rapid recovery, high patient satisfaction, and effective permanent contraception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12850608     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00373-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  21 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic sterilization: history and current methods.

Authors:  James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

2.  Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of essure(r) permanent birth control system and adiana(r) permanent contraception system.

Authors:  Sophia N Palmer; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

3.  Incidence and risk factors for chronic pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization.

Authors:  Amanda C Yunker; Jessica M B Ritch; Erica F Robinson; Cara T Golish
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures.

Authors:  Cindy M Basinski
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

5.  Venous intravasation: a potential pitfall of confirmatory hysterosalpingogram following essure hysteroscopic sterilization.

Authors:  Michael C Chang; John J Shim
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  Adherence to hysterosalpingogram appointments following hysteroscopic sterilization among low-income women.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Regina Kulier; Juan Manuel Nardin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-05

Review 8.  Drugs and Medical Devices: Adverse Events and the Impact on Women's Health.

Authors:  Jennifer L Carey; Nathalie Nader; Peter R Chai; Stephanie Carreiro; Matthew K Griswold; Katherine L Boyle
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Association of Hysteroscopic vs Laparoscopic Sterilization With Procedural, Gynecological, and Medical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kim Bouillon; Marion Bertrand; Georges Bader; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahta Rouhani; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.