Literature DB >> 12850605

Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery.

Tina Delaney1, David C Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in spontaneous versus induced labor after one previous cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Women with one previous cesarean delivery who had spontaneous labor between January 1992 and January 2000 were compared with those whose labor was induced.
RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred forty-six patients had a trial of labor (2943 spontaneous, 803 induced). Those induced had more frequent early postpartum hemorrhage (7.3% versus 5.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18, 2.32), cesarean delivery (37.5% versus 24.2%; OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.51, 2.25), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (13.3% versus 9.4%; OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.25, 2.29). There was a trend toward higher uterine rupture rates in those with induced versus spontaneous labor (0.7% versus 0.3%, P =.128) and for patients undergoing dinoprostone (prostaglandin E(2)) induction versus other methods (1.1% versus 0.6%, P =.62), although neither difference achieved statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: Induced labor is associated with an increased rate of early postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, and neonatal ICU admission. The higher rate of uterine rupture in those who had labor induced was not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12850605     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00355-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.

Authors:  Heather M Bradford; Vicky Cárdenas; Katherine Camacho-Carr; Mona T Lydon-Rochelle
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-02-06

2.  Step 6: does not routinely employ practices, procedures unsupported by scientific evidence: the coalition for improving maternity services:.

Authors:  Henci Goer; Mayri Sagady Leslie; Amy Romano
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

3.  Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Javier Vega Cañadas; María Teulón González; Natalia Pagola Limón; María Sanz Alguacil; María García-Luján Prieto; Rocío Canete Riaza; Rosa Montero-Macías
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Sharon A Gilbert; William A Grobman; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Yoram Sorokin; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Maria A Quigley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  Outcomes of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study using a population database.

Authors:  Sarah J Stock; Evelyn Ferguson; Andrew Duffy; Ian Ford; James Chalmers; Jane E Norman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Association of cord blood levels of IL-17A, but not TGF-β with pre-term neonate.

Authors:  Masoud Mobini; Sakineh Mirzaie; Hossein Khorramdelazad; Nahid Zainodini; Zahra Sabzali; Mina Ghyasi; Mitra Mokhtari; Reza Bahramabadi; Hamid Hakimi; Khodayar Ghorban; Maryam Dadmanesh; Vahid Ehsani; Mohammad Kazemi Arababadi
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.