Literature DB >> 12850415

DNA mixtures in forensic casework: a 4-year retrospective study.

Yolanda Torres1, Inmaculada Flores, Victoria Prieto, Manuel López-Soto, María José Farfán, Angel Carracedo, Pilar Sanz.   

Abstract

Occasionally interpretation guidelines from validation studies are difficult to apply to real forensic casework, especially in the case of mixed samples. Exogenous contamination, an unknown number of contributors or unbalanced proportion of each one in the sample and a varied degree of degradation of the biological materials, contribute to the difficulties in the interpretation of sample profiles. In this paper we have reviewed all the mixed genetic STR profiles encountered in our laboratory over 4 years (1997-2000) and evaluated the problems in the interpretation of the results. From 1547 criminal cases with 2424 samples typed, 163 showed a mixed profile (6.7%). We have observed that occasionally, a mixture appeared in the same sample with one multiplex amplification kit (e.g. Blue) and not with another (e.g. Green). From our results, it can be suggested that technical characteristics of the different fluorochrome groups in the multiplexes override the molecular characteristics of each STR in their capacity to detect mixtures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12850415     DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(03)00161-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  7 in total

1.  The forensic value of X-linked markers in mixed-male DNA analysis.

Authors:  HaiJun He; Lagabaiyila Zha; JinHong Cai; Jian Huang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Confidence interval of the likelihood ratio associated with mixed stain DNA evidence.

Authors:  Gary W Beecham; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Consensus and pool profiles to assist in the analysis and interpretation of complex low template DNA mixtures.

Authors:  Corina Benschop; Hinda Haned; Titia Sijen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Current genetic methodologies in the identification of disaster victims and in forensic analysis.

Authors:  Ewa Ziętkiewicz; Magdalena Witt; Patrycja Daca; Jadwiga Zebracka-Gala; Mariusz Goniewicz; Barbara Jarząb; Michał Witt
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.

Authors:  Frederick R Bieber; John S Buckleton; Bruce Budowle; John M Butler; Michael D Coble
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Uncertainty in estimating the number of contributors from simulated DNA mixture profiles, with and without allele dropout, from Chinese, Malay, Indian, and Caucasian ethnic populations.

Authors:  Kevin Wai Yin Chong; Christopher Kiu-Choong Syn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Corina Benschop; John Buckleton; Øyvind Bleka; Duncan Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.