Literature DB >> 12850020

Passive dendritic integration heavily affects spiking dynamics of recurrent networks.

Giorgio A Ascoli1.   

Abstract

According to dendritic cable theory, proximal synapses give rise to inputs with short delay, high amplitude, and short duration. In contrast, inputs from distal synapses have long delays, low amplitude, and long duration. Nevertheless, large scale neural networks are seldom built with realistically layered synaptic architectures and corresponding electrotonic parameters. Here, we use a simple model to investigate the spike response dynamics of networks with different electrotonic structures. The networks consist of a layer of neurons receiving a sparse feedforward projection from a set of inputs, as well as sparse recurrent connections from within the layer. Firing patterns are set in the inputs, and recorded from the neuron (output) layer. The feedforward and recurrent synapses are independently set as proximal or distal, representing dendritic connections near or far from the soma, respectively. Analyses of firing dynamics indicate that recurrent distal synapses tend to concentrate network activity in fewer neurons, while proximal recurrent synapses result in a more homogeneous activity distribution. In addition, when the feedforward input is regular (spiking or bursting) and asynchronous, the output is regular if recurrent synapses are more distal than feedforward ones, and irregular in the opposite configuration. Finally, the amplitude of network fluctuations in response to asynchronous input is lower if feedforward and recurrent synapses are electrotonically distant from one another (in either configuration). In conclusion, electrotonic effects reflecting different dendritic positions of synaptic inputs significantly influence network dynamics.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12850020     DOI: 10.1016/S0893-6080(03)00090-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  7 in total

Review 1.  Dendritic vulnerability in neurodegenerative disease: insights from analyses of cortical pyramidal neurons in transgenic mouse models.

Authors:  Jennifer I Luebke; Christina M Weaver; Anne B Rocher; Alfredo Rodriguez; Johanna L Crimins; Dara L Dickstein; Susan L Wearne; Patrick R Hof
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Passive and active shaping of unitary responses from associational/commissural and perforant path synapses in hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Tamara Perez-Rosello; John L Baker; Michele Ferrante; Satish Iyengar; Giorgio A Ascoli; Germán Barrionuevo
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Mossy cell dendritic structure quantified and compared with other hippocampal neurons labeled in rats in vivo.

Authors:  Paul S Buckmaster
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Introduction to the fractality principle of consciousness and the sentyon postulate.

Authors:  Erhard Bieberich
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.418

5.  Area-Specific Features of Pyramidal Neurons-a Comparative Study in Mouse and Rhesus Monkey.

Authors:  Joshua P Gilman; Maria Medalla; Jennifer I Luebke
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Influence of highly distinctive structural properties on the excitability of pyramidal neurons in monkey visual and prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Joseph M Amatrudo; Christina M Weaver; Johanna L Crimins; Patrick R Hof; Douglas L Rosene; Jennifer I Luebke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Pyramidal Neurons Are Not Generalizable Building Blocks of Cortical Networks.

Authors:  Jennifer I Luebke
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.856

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.