Literature DB >> 12849916

Are DNA patents bad for medicine?

David B Resnik1.   

Abstract

This paper considers the potential benefits and harms of DNA patenting for biomedical research and medical practice. It argues that, all things considered, the benefits of patenting DNA outweigh the harms, although societies should adopt policies designed to prevent or mitigate the harms associated with patenting. Some of these policies include: (1) reinforcing the research exemption for academic researchers, (2) raising the "bar" for the criteria of patentability, (3) restricting the scope of patents, (4) disclosing conflicts of interest related to DNA patents, (5) sharing the economic benefits of patenting with patients, and (6) providing insurance coverage for some types of genetic tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12849916     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00206-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  4 in total

1.  The importance of being inventive. Critics claim that patents on genes may lead to very broad monopolies and inhibit further innovation. The European patent system provides efficient legal means to address these issues.

Authors:  Berthold Rutz; Siobhán Yeats
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Bioethics methods in the ethical, legal, and social implications of the human genome project literature.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Clair Morrissey
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Charting ELSI's future course: lessons from the recent past.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Clair Morrissey
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Gene characterization index: assessing the depth of gene annotation.

Authors:  Danielle Kemmer; Raf M Podowski; Dimas Yusuf; Jochen Brumm; Warren Cheung; Claes Wahlestedt; Boris Lenhard; Wyeth W Wasserman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.