OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors contributing to low performance of community health workers in Kalabo District, Zambia. METHODS: In a cross-sectional descriptive study, 86 community members, 27 community health workers and nine rural health centre staff were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires. Other methods were focus group discussions and checklists. Data analysis was done manually. RESULTS: The low performance of community health workers is a real problem for Kalabo District. The two most important factors are the irregular and unreliable supply of drugs and selection of the wrong people to be trained for community health workers. CONCLUSION: Though initially implemented as such, the comprehensive approach of the primary health care project is no longer functioning in Kalabo. Community health workers are mainly valued because of their curative services. Communities do not properly follow the official criteria for selection of people to be trained, but have other considerations. Strategies will have to be formulated to rehabilitate the programme, mainly focussing on these two findings. Other factors, like inadequate community support and inadequate supervision, were mentioned by many contributors.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors contributing to low performance of community health workers in Kalabo District, Zambia. METHODS: In a cross-sectional descriptive study, 86 community members, 27 community health workers and nine rural health centre staff were interviewed using semi-structured questionnaires. Other methods were focus group discussions and checklists. Data analysis was done manually. RESULTS: The low performance of community health workers is a real problem for Kalabo District. The two most important factors are the irregular and unreliable supply of drugs and selection of the wrong people to be trained for community health workers. CONCLUSION: Though initially implemented as such, the comprehensive approach of the primary health care project is no longer functioning in Kalabo. Community health workers are mainly valued because of their curative services. Communities do not properly follow the official criteria for selection of people to be trained, but have other considerations. Strategies will have to be formulated to rehabilitate the programme, mainly focussing on these two findings. Other factors, like inadequate community support and inadequate supervision, were mentioned by many contributors.
Authors: Abimbola Olaniran; Jane Briggs; Ami Pradhan; Erin Bogue; Benjamin Schreiber; Hannah Sarah Dini; Hitesh Hurkchand; Madeleine Ballard Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2022-07-15
Authors: Binod Shrestha; Dan J Green; Manish Baidya; Tim Chater; Jiban Karki; Andrew Ck Lee; Seema Khadka; Gerda Pohl; Rudra Neupane; Simon Rushton Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Joan N Kalyango; Elizeus Rutebemberwa; Tobias Alfven; Sarah Ssali; Stefan Peterson; Charles Karamagi Journal: Malar J Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru; Kate Gilroy; Adnan A Hyder; Asha George; Humphreys Nsona; Angella Mtimuni; Bernie Zakeyo; Josiah Mayani; Cristina V Cardemil; Jennifer Bryce Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 2.655