Literature DB >> 12849824

Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases.

Ettore Cicinelli1, Carlo Parisi, Pietro Galantino, Vincenzo Pinto, Bruno Barba, Sergio Schonauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, feasibility, and safety of lens-based minihysteroscopy.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: Academic research environment. PATIENT(S): Women with different indications for hysteroscopy. INTERVENTION(S): Six thousand seventeen outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies with a minihysteroscope (2.7-mm outer diameter [OD] telescope with 3.5-mm OD single-flow diagnostic sheath) and 4,204 with traditional hysteroscope (4-mm OD telescope with 5-mm OD single-flow diagnostic sheath). All hysteroscopies were performed using a vaginoscopic approach and saline to distend the uterus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rate of successful introduction of the hysteroscope, rate of satisfactory examinations, pain intensity experienced using an arbitrary pain scale (0 = no pain; 1 = low pain; 2 = moderate pain; 3 = severe pain), and number of side effects and complications. RESULT(S): In the minihysteroscopy, group rates of successful introduction and satisfactory examinations were significantly higher than in the traditional hysteroscope group (99.52% vs.72.53% and 98.53% vs. 92.33%, respectively), while pain and vagal reactions were significantly lower (0.10 +/- 0.34 vs.1.09 +/- 0.53 and 2.25% vs.17.12%, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): Hysteroscopy with lens-based minihysteroscopes was easier, less painful, more reliable, and safer than with 5-mm hysteroscopes. Minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach is a very well tolerated, effective, and safe outpatient procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12849824     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00546-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.

Authors:  Pierre Panel; Michael Bajka; Arnaud Le Tohic; Alaa El Ghoneimi; Carmen Chis; Stéphane Cotin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Chronic endometritis due to common bacteria is prevalent in women with recurrent miscarriage as confirmed by improved pregnancy outcome after antibiotic treatment.

Authors:  Ettore Cicinelli; Maria Matteo; Raffaele Tinelli; Vincenzo Pinto; Marco Marinaccio; Ugo Indraccolo; Dominique De Ziegler; Leonardo Resta
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Two-Step Office-Based Hysteroscopic Operation for Submucosal Myoma.

Authors:  Sung-Tack Oh; Hyun Kyung Ryu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  The diagnostic value of human epididymis protein 4 for endometrial cancer is moderate.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Lili Han; Zhen Jiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical trial of Hysteroscopic Septal Resection Using Conventional Resectoscope Versus Mini-resectoscope.

Authors:  Kallol Kumar Roy; S M Anusha; Rakhi Rai; Anamika Das; Rinchen Zangmo; Seema Singhal
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-30

6.  A Pilot Study Comparing Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis by Conventional Resectoscope Versus Mini-resectoscope.

Authors:  Kallol Kumar Roy; Archana Lingampally; Yamini Kansal; Juhi Bharti; Sunesh Kumar; Perumal Vanamail; Seema Singhal; Jyoti Meena
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-11

7.  Impact of anxiety levels on the perception of pain in patients undergoing office hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Felice Sorrentino; Annamaria Petito; Stefano Angioni; Francesco D'Antonio; Melania Severo; Maria Cristina Solazzo; Raffaele Tinelli; Luigi Nappi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.