Literature DB >> 12849765

The contributions of lesion laterality and lesion volume to decision-making impairment following frontal lobe damage.

Luke Clark1, Facundo Manes, Nagui Antoun, Barbara J Sahakian, Trevor W Robbins.   

Abstract

Lesions to prefrontal cortex (PFC) in humans can severely disrupt everyday decision-making, with concomitant effects on social and occupational functioning. Forty-six patients with unilateral lesions to prefrontal cortex and 21 healthy control subjects were administered three neuropsychological measures of decision-making: the Iowa Gambling Task, the Cambridge Gamble Task, and the Risk Task. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were acquired from 40 patients, with region of interest (ROI) mapping of prefrontal subregions. The frontal patients showed only limited damage in medial and orbital prefrontal cortex, but greater damage in lateral prefrontal regions of interest. Patients with right frontal lesions preferred the risky decks on the Iowa Gambling Task, and differed significantly from left frontal and control subjects. Within the right frontal group, the preference for the risky decks was correlated with the total lesion volume and the volume of damage outside of the ventromedial prefrontal region. Right and left frontal groups did not differ significantly on the Cambridge Gamble Task or the Risk Task, and performance was not associated with lesion volume. The results indicate a laterality effect on the Iowa Gambling Task, and the contribution of prefrontal regions outside the ventromedial region to task performance. The Cambridge Gamble Task and Risk Task were less sensitive to the effects of unilateral frontal lobe lesions, and may be more selectively associated with ventral prefrontal damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12849765     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00081-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  76 in total

1.  The amygdala and decision-making.

Authors:  Rupa Gupta; Timothy R Koscik; Antoine Bechara; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Recruitment of intuitive versus analytic thinking strategies affects the role of working memory in a gambling task.

Authors:  Marta Gozzi; Paolo Cherubini; Costanza Papagno; Emanuela Bricolo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-10

3.  Effects of dilemmas and aromas on performance of the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  William H Overman; Laura Boettcher; Lucas Watterson; Katherine Walsh
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Affective judgment and beneficial decision making: ventromedial prefrontal activity correlates with performance in the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Georg Northoff; Simone Grimm; Heinz Boeker; Conny Schmidt; Felix Bermpohl; Alexander Heinzel; Daniel Hell; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Is speeding a form of gambling in adolescents?

Authors:  David S Husted; Mark S Gold; Kimberly Frost-Pineda; Mary A Ferguson; Mark C K Yang; Nathan A Shapira
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2006-06-29

6.  Prefrontal cortex activity is reduced in gambling and nongambling substance users during decision-making.

Authors:  Jody Tanabe; Laetitia Thompson; Eric Claus; Manish Dalwani; Kent Hutchison; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neural correlates of decision making with explicit information about probabilities and incentives in elderly healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kirsten Labudda; Friedrich G Woermann; Markus Mertens; Bernd Pohlmann-Eden; Hans J Markowitsch; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Inactivation of the prelimbic or infralimbic cortex impairs decision-making in the rat gambling task.

Authors:  Fiona D Zeeb; P J J Baarendse; L J M J Vanderschuren; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Gamma activity modulated by naming of ambiguous and unambiguous images: intracranial recording.

Authors:  Yoshimi Cho-Hisamoto; Katsuaki Kojima; Erik C Brown; Naoyuki Matsuzaki; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Lack of effects of guanfacine on executive and memory functions in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Ulrich Müller; Luke Clark; Minh L Lam; Rebecca M Moore; C Louise Murphy; Nicola K Richmond; Ranbir S Sandhu; Ingrid A Wilkins; David K Menon; Barbara J Sahakian; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.