Literature DB >> 12849722

Comparative toxicity of ifosfamide metabolites and protective effect of mesna and amifostine in cultured renal tubule cells.

Emad L Zaki1, James E Springate, Mary Taub.   

Abstract

Renal injury is a common side effect of the chemotherapeutic agent ifosfamide. Current evidence suggests that the ifosfamide metabolite chloroacetaldehyde contributes to this nephrotoxicity. The present study examined the effects of chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein, another ifosfamide metabolite, on rabbit proximal renal tubule cells in primary culture. The ability of the uroprotectant medications sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) and amifostine to prevent chloroacetaldehyde- and acrolein-induced renal cell injury was also assessed. Chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein (25-200 M) produced dose-dependent declines in neutral red dye uptake, glucose transport and glutathione content. Chloroacetaldehyde was a more potent toxin than acrolein. Pretreatment of cells with the glutathione-depleting agent buthionine sulfoximine enhanced the toxicity of both chloroacetaldehyde and acrolein while co-administration of mesna or amifostine prevented metabolite toxicity. These results support the hypothesis that chloroacetaldehyde is responsible for ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity. The protective effect of mesna and amifostine in vitro contrasts with clinical experience showing that these medications do not eliminate ifosfamide nephrotoxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12849722     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2333(03)00044-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  10 in total

1.  Ifosfamide induced Fanconi syndrome.

Authors:  Samantha Buttemer; Mohan Pai; Keith K Lau
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-12-20

2.  Monitoring renal function during chemotherapy.

Authors:  Louise B Hartlev; Charlotte R Boeje; Henrik Bluhme; Torben Palshof; Michael Rehling
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  PharmGKB summary: ifosfamide pathways, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Daniella Lowenberg; Caroline F Thorn; Zeruesenay Desta; David A Flockhart; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Primary kidney cells.

Authors:  M Taub
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1997

5.  Ifosfamide toxicity in cultured proximal renal tubule cells.

Authors:  James Springate; Mary Taub
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  In vivo mesna and amifostine do not prevent chloroacetaldehyde nephrotoxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Zeinab Yaseen; Christian Michoudet; Gabriel Baverel; Laurence Dubourg
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  The cytogenetic action of ifosfamide, mesna, and their combination on peripheral rabbit lymphocytes: an in vivo/in vitro cytogenetic study.

Authors:  S Bogiatzi; O Pagonopoulou; M Simopoulou; D Kareli; A Kouskoukis; Z Koutka; P Ipsilantis; T Lialiaris
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  A novel gold-nanocluster-based fluorescent sensor for detection of sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate.

Authors:  Jiaxing Su; Chenchen Feng; Yuan Wu; Jiangong Liang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.036

9.  Effect of glutathione depletion on Ifosfamide nephrotoxicity in rats.

Authors:  Sudha Garimella-Krovi; James E Springate
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2008-09

10.  Comparision of uroprotective activity of reduced glutathione with mesna in ifosfamide induced hemorrhagic cystitis in rats.

Authors:  Syed Amir Ali; Sandeep Kumar Danda; Syed Abdul Azeez Basha; Asif Rasheed; Osman Ahmed; M Muqtedar Ahmed
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.200

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.