OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess entrainment for distinguishing far-field potentials (FFP) due to depolarization of tissue at a distance from the mapping catheter from the local potential (LP) due to depolarization of tissue at the catheter electrode during mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND: Electrograms with multiple peaks commonly complicate mapping and identification of catheter ablation targets in infarcts. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of catheter mapping data from eight patients with prior infarction was performed to evaluate multipotential electrograms at sites where pacing entrained VT. Potentials that were visible and not altered during pacing were defined as FFP. Potentials obscured by the pacing stimulus were designated possible LPs. The criteria for FFP were then assessed in a second cohort of five patients. RESULTS: At 32 of 39 (82%) sites with multiple potentials, entrainment identified one of the potentials as an FFP. Radiofrequency ablation, assessed at 15 sites, reduced the amplitude of LPs by 62%, without significant effect on FFP amplitude. At 56% of sites with multiple potentials, measuring the postpacing interval to an FFP would lead to erroneous classification of the site location relative to the reentry circuit. In prospective evaluation, double potentials were identified at 77 sites in infarcts; entrainment demonstrated an FFP at 66 (86%) sites. CONCLUSIONS: Far-field potentials are common during mapping in infarcts. Many can be distinguished from local potentials by entrainment, improving the accuracy of mapping.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess entrainment for distinguishing far-field potentials (FFP) due to depolarization of tissue at a distance from the mapping catheter from the local potential (LP) due to depolarization of tissue at the catheter electrode during mapping of ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND: Electrograms with multiple peaks commonly complicate mapping and identification of catheter ablation targets in infarcts. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of catheter mapping data from eight patients with prior infarction was performed to evaluate multipotential electrograms at sites where pacing entrained VT. Potentials that were visible and not altered during pacing were defined as FFP. Potentials obscured by the pacing stimulus were designated possible LPs. The criteria for FFP were then assessed in a second cohort of five patients. RESULTS: At 32 of 39 (82%) sites with multiple potentials, entrainment identified one of the potentials as an FFP. Radiofrequency ablation, assessed at 15 sites, reduced the amplitude of LPs by 62%, without significant effect on FFP amplitude. At 56% of sites with multiple potentials, measuring the postpacing interval to an FFP would lead to erroneous classification of the site location relative to the reentry circuit. In prospective evaluation, double potentials were identified at 77 sites in infarcts; entrainment demonstrated an FFP at 66 (86%) sites. CONCLUSIONS: Far-field potentials are common during mapping in infarcts. Many can be distinguished from local potentials by entrainment, improving the accuracy of mapping.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Robert E Park; Laszlo Saghy; Erica S Zado; Cory M Tschabrunn; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 1.900