Literature DB >> 12848634

A comparison of the upper gastrointestinal mucosal effects of valdecoxib, naproxen and placebo in healthy elderly subjects.

J L Goldstein1, A J Kivitz, K M Verburg, D P Recker, R C Palmer, J D Kent.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In long-term outcomes studies, cyclooxygenase COX-2 specific inhibitors spare COX-1 at supratherapeutic doses and therefore demonstrate improved gastrointestinal safety over nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, in clinical practice, anti-inflammatory drugs are often used for short-term treatment of pain. AIM: To compare the short-term upper gastrointestinal mucosal effects of naproxen with the new COX-2 specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, or placebo, in elderly subjects.
METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomized, study, elderly subjects (65-76 years old), with a normal baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), received oral valdecoxib (a supratherapeutic 40 mg b.d. dosage, n = 62), naproxen (500 mg b.d., n = 62), or placebo (n = 62) for 6.5 days. Upper gastrointestinal mucosal injury was evaluated post-treatment by EGD (day 7).
RESULTS: Subjects receiving naproxen (11/60, 18%) had significantly more gastroduodenal ulcers post-treatment than those receiving placebo (2/61, 3%; P < 0.01) or valdecoxib (0/60, 0%; P < 0.001). A similar significant finding was observed for gastric ulcer rates. All treatments had similar adverse event rates and clinical laboratory findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Valdecoxib, even at supratherapeutic doses, was associated with an ulcer rate significantly lower than naproxen but similar to placebo in healthy elderly subjects, despite the short duration of therapy (6.5 days). Naproxen and valdecoxib were as well tolerated as placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12848634     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  6 in total

1.  A proof-of-concept, Phase 2 clinical trial of the gastrointestinal safety of a hydrogen sulfide-releasing anti-inflammatory drug.

Authors:  John L Wallace; Peter Nagy; Troy D Feener; Thibault Allain; Tamás Ditrói; David J Vaughan; Marcelo N Muscara; Gilberto de Nucci; Andre G Buret
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Valdecoxib for treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. A randomized, double-blind comparison with placebo and naproxen.

Authors:  Stephen E Daniels; Sarah Torri; Paul J Desjardins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Valdecoxib: a review of its use in the management of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, dysmenorrhoea and acute pain.

Authors:  Caroline Fenton; Gillian M Keating; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Postoperative pain-from mechanisms to treatment.

Authors:  Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn; Daniel Segelcke; Stephan A Schug
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 5.  Clinical Guidelines for Drug-Related Peptic Ulcer, 2020 Revised Edition.

Authors:  Moon Kyung Joo; Chan Hyuk Park; Joon Sung Kim; Jae Myung Park; Ji Yong Ahn; Bong Eun Lee; Jeong Hoon Lee; Hyo-Joon Yang; Yu Kyung Cho; Chang Seok Bang; Beom Jin Kim; Hye-Kyung Jung; Byung-Wook Kim; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 6.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020.

Authors:  Tomoari Kamada; Kiichi Satoh; Toshiyuki Itoh; Masanori Ito; Junichi Iwamoto; Tadayoshi Okimoto; Takeshi Kanno; Mitsushige Sugimoto; Toshimi Chiba; Sachiyo Nomura; Mitsuyo Mieda; Hideyuki Hiraishi; Junji Yoshino; Atsushi Takagi; Sumio Watanabe; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 7.527

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.