Literature DB >> 12848397

HTA responses and the classic HTA report.

Ruairidh Milne1, Andrew Clegg, Andrew Stevens.   

Abstract

Reports produced in response to the need for health technology assessment (HTA) vary greatly in the methods they use, depending on the decision-maker's needs, the technology's characteristics and the resources available. HTA reports vary from the brief, such as 'vignettes' produced when a new technology emerges, to the exhaustive, such as 'Cochrane reviews' synthesising a mature evidence base. They may address a wide range of different questions. 'Classic HTAs', typically those reports prepared to support NICE appraisal decisions, seek to use scientifically rigorous methods to address a focused policy question. These are based on systematic reviews of the effectiveness evidence but this is often fed into economic models, in order to generate estimates of cost-effectiveness. Future developments in HTA responses will reflect both the embedding of systematic methods and a growing responsiveness to customer needs.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12848397     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  5 in total

1.  Institutionalizing telemedicine applications: the challenge of legitimizing decision-making.

Authors:  Paolo Zanaboni; Emanuele Lettieri
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 14. Reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Atle Fretheim
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2006-12-08

3.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Atle Fretheim
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2006-12-05

4.  Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews.

Authors:  Robin M Featherstone; Donna M Dryden; Michelle Foisy; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Matthew D Mitchell; Robin A Paynter; Karen A Robinson; Craig A Umscheid; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-17

Review 5.  Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Ansgar Lange; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.