Literature DB >> 12848220

Biased predecision processing.

Aaron L Brownstein1.   

Abstract

Decision makers conduct biased predecision processing when they restructure their mental representation of the decision environment to favor one alternative before making their choice. The question of whether biased predecision processing occurs has been controversial since L. Festinger (1957) maintained that it does not occur. The author reviews relevant research in sections on theories of cognitive dissonance, decision conflict, choice certainty, action control, action phases, dominance structuring, differentiation and consolidation, constructive processing, motivated reasoning, and groupthink. Some studies did not find evidence of biased predecision processing, but many did. In the Discussion section, the moderators are summarized and used to assess the theories.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12848220     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  11 in total

1.  When advocacy obscures accuracy online: digital pandemics of public health misinformation through an antifluoride case study.

Authors:  Brittany Seymour; Rebekah Getman; Avinash Saraf; Lily H Zhang; Elsbeth Kalenderian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cognitive Demands and Bias: Challenges Facing Clinical Competency Committees.

Authors:  Chandlee C Dickey; Christopher Thomas; Usama Feroze; Firas Nakshabandi; Barbara Cannon
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-04

3.  A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Alessandra Tasso; Marzena Franiuk; Liliana Varesco; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Sizing up information distortion: quantifying its effect on the subjective values of choice options.

Authors:  Michael L DeKay; Eric R Stone; Clare M Sorenson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

5.  Choice theories: What are they good for?

Authors:  Eric J Johnson
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2013-01-01

6.  The Feasibility of a Newly Developed Local Network System for Cardiac Rehabilitation (the CR-GNet) in Disease Management and Physical Fitness after Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Takahiro Ando; Takatomo Watanabe; Saori Matsuo; Tomoki Samejima; Junya Yamagishi; Takanobu Bito; Genki Naruse; Akihiro Yoshida; Shingo Minatoguchi; Haruhiko Akiyama; Kazuhiko Nishigaki; Shinya Minatoguchi; Hiroyuki Okura
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2022-02-22

7.  Pregnancy as foreground in cystic fibrosis carrier testing decisions in primary care.

Authors:  Kathleen J H Sparbel; Janet K Williams
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-02

8.  An Investigation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence Associated with Diagnostic Checklists as Well as Gender Biases in Relation to Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Jan C Cwik; Fabienne Papen; Jan-Erik Lemke; Jürgen Margraf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-22

9.  What You Find Depends on How You Measure It: Reactivity of Response Scales Measuring Predecisional Information Distortion in Medical Diagnosis.

Authors:  Martine Nurek; Olga Kostopoulou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Role of Physicians' First Impressions in the Diagnosis of Possible Cancers without Alarm Symptoms.

Authors:  Olga Kostopoulou; Miroslav Sirota; Thomas Round; Shyamalee Samaranayaka; Brendan C Delaney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.