PURPOSE: To evaluate the authors' preliminary experience with use of endovascular methods to treat inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis in patients with IVC filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Catheter-directed thrombolysis, balloon maceration, mechanical thrombectomy, and stent placement were used to treat 10 patients with thrombosis of filter-bearing IVCs causing symptoms in 18 limbs. Procedural challenges, technical and clinical success, complications, postprocedural filter status, and postprocedural pulmonary embolism (PE) prophylaxis were monitored. RESULTS: Technical and clinical success were achieved in 15 of 18 (83%) and 14 of 18 symptomatic limbs (78%), respectively. Major bleeding (muscular hematoma) occurred in one patient (10%). Postprocedural PE prophylaxis included anticoagulation (n = 8) and placement of a new filter into a newly placed Wallstent (n = 1). During clinical follow-up, no clinically detectable PE was observed. Data pertaining to late limb status were available at a median of 19 months (range 1-46 months) follow-up in seven patients: three patients were asymptomatic, two patients had ambulatory edema only, one patient had constant mild edema, and one patient had constant severe edema. Postprocedural filter stability was radiographically documented at a median of 255 days (range, 4-1021 d) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Endovascular recanalization of the occluded IVC is feasible even in the presence of an IVC filter.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the authors' preliminary experience with use of endovascular methods to treat inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis in patients with IVC filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Catheter-directed thrombolysis, balloon maceration, mechanical thrombectomy, and stent placement were used to treat 10 patients with thrombosis of filter-bearing IVCs causing symptoms in 18 limbs. Procedural challenges, technical and clinical success, complications, postprocedural filter status, and postprocedural pulmonary embolism (PE) prophylaxis were monitored. RESULTS: Technical and clinical success were achieved in 15 of 18 (83%) and 14 of 18 symptomatic limbs (78%), respectively. Major bleeding (muscular hematoma) occurred in one patient (10%). Postprocedural PE prophylaxis included anticoagulation (n = 8) and placement of a new filter into a newly placed Wallstent (n = 1). During clinical follow-up, no clinically detectable PE was observed. Data pertaining to late limb status were available at a median of 19 months (range 1-46 months) follow-up in seven patients: three patients were asymptomatic, two patients had ambulatory edema only, one patient had constant mild edema, and one patient had constant severe edema. Postprocedural filter stability was radiographically documented at a median of 255 days (range, 4-1021 d) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Endovascular recanalization of the occluded IVC is feasible even in the presence of an IVC filter.
Authors: Suresh Vedantham; Susan R Kahn; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Anthony J Comerota; Sameer Parpia; Sreelatha Meleth; Diane Earp; Rick Williams; Akhilesh K Sista; William Marston; Suman Rathbun; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Mahmood K Razavi; Michael R Jaff; Clive Kearon Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Joseph L McDevitt; Ravi N Srinivasa; Anthony N Hage; Jacob J Bundy; Joseph J Gemmete; Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2019-03-09
Authors: Mohamed Elboraey; Beau B Toskich; Andrew R Lewis; Charles A Ritchie; Gregory T Frey; Zlatko Devcic Journal: J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech Date: 2021-05-21