M Bülow1, R Olsson, O Ekberg. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. Margareta.Bulow@rontgen.mas.lu.se
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze how carbonated thin liquids affected the physiology of swallowing in dysphagic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 40 patients were analyzed; 36 were neurologically impaired. During a therapeutic videoradiographic swallowing examination the patients had to swallow liquids with the following consistencies three times: thin, thickened and carbonated. The liquids were given in doses of 3 x 5 ml. The swallows were analyzed regarding penetration/aspiration, pharyngeal transit time and pharyngeal retention. RESULTS: Significant difference was found regarding penetration/aspiration when comparisons were made between thin liquid and carbonated thin liquid (p<0.0001). Carbonated liquid reduced the penetration to the airways. The comparison between thin liquid and thickened liquid (p<0.0001) showed significant less penetration with thickened liquids. Pharyngeal transit time was reduced both when comparing thin liquid with thin carbonated liquid (p<0.0001) and thickened liquid (p<0.0001). Pharyngeal retention was significantly reduced (p<0.0001) with carbonated thin liquid compared to thickened liquid. The comparison of thin liquids and carbonated thin liquids showed p=0.0013, thin and thickened liquids p=0.0097. CONCLUSIONS: Carbonated liquids reduced penetration/aspiration into the airways, reduced pharyngeal retention and pharyngeal transit time became shorter. Therefore, carbonated liquids are a valuable treatment option for patients with penetration/aspiration. Thickened liquids may still be an option for patients who cannot tolerate carbonated liquids and liquids with this consistency are safer than thin liquids.
PURPOSE: To analyze how carbonated thin liquids affected the physiology of swallowing in dysphagic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 40 patients were analyzed; 36 were neurologically impaired. During a therapeutic videoradiographic swallowing examination the patients had to swallow liquids with the following consistencies three times: thin, thickened and carbonated. The liquids were given in doses of 3 x 5 ml. The swallows were analyzed regarding penetration/aspiration, pharyngeal transit time and pharyngeal retention. RESULTS: Significant difference was found regarding penetration/aspiration when comparisons were made between thin liquid and carbonated thin liquid (p<0.0001). Carbonated liquid reduced the penetration to the airways. The comparison between thin liquid and thickened liquid (p<0.0001) showed significant less penetration with thickened liquids. Pharyngeal transit time was reduced both when comparing thin liquid with thin carbonated liquid (p<0.0001) and thickened liquid (p<0.0001). Pharyngeal retention was significantly reduced (p<0.0001) with carbonated thin liquid compared to thickened liquid. The comparison of thin liquids and carbonated thin liquids showed p=0.0013, thin and thickened liquids p=0.0097. CONCLUSIONS: Carbonated liquids reduced penetration/aspiration into the airways, reduced pharyngeal retention and pharyngeal transit time became shorter. Therefore, carbonated liquids are a valuable treatment option for patients with penetration/aspiration. Thickened liquids may still be an option for patients who cannot tolerate carbonated liquids and liquids with this consistency are safer than thin liquids.
Authors: Ianessa A Humbert; Christopher J Poletto; Keith G Saxon; Pamela R Kearney; Lisa Crujido; Wilhelmina Wright-Harp; Joan Payne; Neal Jeffries; Barbara C Sonies; Christy L Ludlow Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2006-07-27
Authors: Barbara Roa Pauloski; Jerilyn A Logemann; Alfred W Rademaker; Donna Lundy; Paula A Sullivan; Lisa A Newman; Cathy Lazarus; Mary Bacon Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Jeri A Logemann; Gary Gensler; Joanne Robbins; Anne S Lindblad; Diane Brandt; Jacqueline A Hind; Steven Kosek; Karen Dikeman; Marta Kazandjian; Gary D Gramigna; Donna Lundy; Susan McGarvey-Toler; Patricia J Miller Gardner Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.297