Literature DB >> 12846606

A fractal analysis of human cranial sutures.

Jack C Yu1, Ronald L Wright, Matthew A Williamson, James P Braselton, Martha L Abell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many biological structures are products of repeated iteration functions. As such, they demonstrate characteristic, scale-invariant features. Fractal analysis of these features elucidates the mechanism of their formation. The objectives of this project were to determine whether human cranial sutures demonstrate self-similarity and measure their exponents of similarity (fractal dimensions).
DESIGN: One hundred three documented human skulls from the Terry Collection of the Smithsonian Institution were used. Their sagittal sutures were digitized and the data converted to bitmap images for analysis using box-counting method of fractal software.
RESULTS: The log-log plots of the number of boxes containing the sutural pattern, N(r), and the size of the boxes, r, were all linear, indicating that human sagittal sutures possess scale-invariant features and thus are fractals. The linear portion of these log-log plots has limits because of the finite resolution used for data acquisition. The mean box dimension, D(b), was 1.29289 +/- 0.078457 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.27634 to 1.30944.
CONCLUSIONS: Human sagittal sutures are self-similar and have a fractal dimension of 1.29 by the box-counting method. The significance of these findings includes: sutural morphogenesis can be described as a repeated iteration function, and mathematical models can be constructed to produce self-similar curves with such D(b). This elucidates the mechanism of actual pattern formation. Whatever the mechanisms at the cellular and molecular levels, human sagittal suture follows the equation log N(r) = 1.29 log 1/r, where N(r) is the number of square boxes with sides r that are needed to contain the sutural pattern and r equals the length of the sides of the boxes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12846606     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_2003_040_0409_afaohc_2.0.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  10 in total

1.  Error estimation of the fractal dimension measurements of cranial sutures.

Authors:  Andrzej Z Górski; Janusz Skrzat
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  A bidirectional interface growth model for cranial interosseous suture morphogenesis.

Authors:  Christoph P E Zollikofer; John David Weissmann
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Cranial sutures: a multidisciplinary review.

Authors:  Antonio Di Ieva; Emiliano Bruner; Jennilee Davidson; Patrizia Pisano; Thomas Haider; Scellig S Stone; Michael D Cusimano; Manfred Tschabitscher; Fabio Grizzi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  The mouse palate and its cellular responses to midpalatal suture expansion forces.

Authors:  N Katebi; E Kolpakova-Hart; C Y Lin; B R Olsen
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  The role of the sutures in biomechanical dynamic simulation of a macaque cranial finite element model: implications for the evolution of craniofacial form.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Sarah A Wood; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Uriel Zapata; Craig D Byron; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Changes in biomechanical strain and morphology of rat calvarial sutures and bone after Tgf-β3 inhibition of posterior interfrontal suture fusion.

Authors:  Reiko Shibazaki-Yorozuya; Qian Wang; Paul C Dechow; Koutaro Maki; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Mechanism of skull suture maintenance and interdigitation.

Authors:  Takashi Miura; Chad A Perlyn; Masato Kinboshi; Naomichi Ogihara; Mikiko Kobayashi-Miura; Gillian M Morriss-Kay; Kohei Shiota
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Stretch force guides finger-like pattern of bone formation in suture.

Authors:  Bo-Hai Wu; Xiao-Xing Kou; Ci Zhang; Yi-Mei Zhang; Zhen Cui; Xue-Dong Wang; Yan Liu; Da-Wei Liu; Yan-Heng Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Novel methodologies and technologies to assess mid-palatal suture maturation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Darren Isfeld; Manuel Lagravere; Vladimir Leon-Salazar; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Quantitative evaluation of midpalatal suture maturation via fractal analysis.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Kwak; Seong Sik Kim; Yong-Il Kim; Yong-Deok Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.