BACKGROUND/AIMS: Extended lymphadenectomy (D2) with complete resection of gastric cancer has been generally accepted as a standard treatment modality in Japan. However, the clinical evaluation of the superextended lymphadenectomy (D3/D4) for advanced type of gastric cancer has not been established. METHODOLOGY: Eight hundred and twenty primary gastric cancer patients underwent gastric resection in our institute (1987-1997). Of those patients, 436 patients with more than t2 depth of cancer invasion underwent curative gastrectomy either with D2 (337 cases) or D3/D4 (99 cases). D3/D4 was performed for the cases in which metastasis was recognized in N2 lymph nodes with gross inspection at the time of operation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant survival advantage to the D3/D4 when comparing between the D2 and D3/D4 groups. However, the relative risk of death due to postoperative relapse in the D3/D4 showed a significantly lower hazard ratio than in the D2, in the Cox proportional-hazard model (0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.94). Patients receiving D3/D4 lymphadenectomy showed a better 5-year survival rate in stage IIIb than those with D2 (18.4% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.039). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups as regards postoperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: D3/D4 lymphadenectomy might be of therapeutic value for limited patients with advanced gastric cancer.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Extended lymphadenectomy (D2) with complete resection of gastric cancer has been generally accepted as a standard treatment modality in Japan. However, the clinical evaluation of the superextended lymphadenectomy (D3/D4) for advanced type of gastric cancer has not been established. METHODOLOGY: Eight hundred and twenty primary gastric cancerpatients underwent gastric resection in our institute (1987-1997). Of those patients, 436 patients with more than t2 depth of cancer invasion underwent curative gastrectomy either with D2 (337 cases) or D3/D4 (99 cases). D3/D4 was performed for the cases in which metastasis was recognized in N2 lymph nodes with gross inspection at the time of operation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant survival advantage to the D3/D4 when comparing between the D2 and D3/D4 groups. However, the relative risk of death due to postoperative relapse in the D3/D4 showed a significantly lower hazard ratio than in the D2, in the Cox proportional-hazard model (0.67; 95% CI: 0.47-0.94). Patients receiving D3/D4 lymphadenectomy showed a better 5-year survival rate in stage IIIb than those with D2 (18.4% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.039). No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups as regards postoperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: D3/D4 lymphadenectomy might be of therapeutic value for limited patients with advanced gastric cancer.