Literature DB >> 12844251

Stem respiratory potential in six softwood and four hardwood tree species in the central cascades of Oregon.

Michele L Pruyn1, Mark E Harmon, B L Gartner.   

Abstract

Mature and old growth trees of varying sapwood thickness were compared with regard to stem respiration. An increment core-based, laboratory method under controlled temperature was used to measure tissue-level respiration (termed respiratory potential) of ten different tree species. Bark (dead outer and live inner combined), sapwood, and heartwood thickness measurements were used to predict sapwood volume from stem diameter (including bark) for four of the ten species. These predictions of sapwood volume were used to scale respiratory potential to the main-bole level (excluding all branches). On the core level, species that maintained narrow sapwood (8-16% of bole radius) such as Pseudotusga menziesii, Taxus brevifolia, and Thuja plicata, had sapwood respiratory potentials in the lower bole that were 50% higher (P<0.05) than species with wide sapwood (>16% of bole radius), such as Abies amabilis, Pinus monticola, and Tsuga heterophylla. This pattern was not observed for inner bark respiratory potential, or for sapwood respiratory potential within the crown. On the main-bole level, respiratory potential per unit volume was inversely correlated to the live bole volumetric fraction (inner bark plus sapwood divided by whole bole volume) (Adj. R(2)=0.6). Specifically, tree species with 18-20% of the main bole alive potentially respired 1.3-3 times more per unit live bole volume than species with over 40%, suggesting that the live bole was less metabolically active in tree species that maintained large volumes of sapwood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12844251     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1316-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Respiratory potential in sapwood of old versus young ponderosa pine trees in the Pacific Northwest.

Authors:  Michele L Pruyn; Barbara L Gartner; Mark E Harmon
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Woody tissue maintenance respiration of four conifers in contrasting climates.

Authors:  Michael G Ryan; Stith T Gower; Robert M Hubbard; Richard H Waring; Henry L Gholz; Wendell P Cropper; Steven W Running
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Temperature variation and distribution of living cells within tree stems: implications for stem respiration modeling and scale-up.

Authors:  J Stockfors
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Respiration, growth and maintenance in plants.

Authors:  J H Thornley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Stem respiration in a closed-canopy upland oak forest.

Authors:  N T Edwards; P J Hanson
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue and stand respiration in Pinus radiata in relation to nitrogen status.

Authors:  M G Ryan; R M Hubbard; S Pongracic; R J Raison; R E McMurtrie
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Growth and maintenance respiration rates of aspen, black spruce and jack pine stems at northern and southern BOREAS sites.

Authors:  M. B. Lavigne; M. G. Ryan
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1997 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Effects of temperature and tissue nitrogen on dormant season stem and branch maintenance respiration in a young loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation.

Authors:  C. A. Maier; S. J. Zarnoch; P. M. Dougherty
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.196

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Diel patterns of stem CO2 efflux vary among cycads, arborescent monocots, and woody eudicots and gymnosperms.

Authors:  Thomas E Marler; Anders J Lindström
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2020-02-26

2.  Nitrogen concentration and physical properties are key drivers of woody tissue respiration.

Authors:  Andrea C Westerband; Ian J Wright; Allyson S D Eller; Lucas A Cernusak; Peter B Reich; Oscar Perez-Priego; Shubham S Chhajed; Lindsay B Hutley; Caroline E R Lehmann
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.040

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.