UNLABELLED: With the introduction of spiral scanning then multidetector technologies, the accuracy for diagnosing digestive tract diseases with CT has been highly improved, and CT is used more and more in the evaluation of patients with suspected gastrointestinal disorders. CT is able to demonstrate both the intramural and the extramural components of the disease, and has a major role in the preoperative staging and the follow-up. Improvements of CT protocols, such as CT-enteroclysis, or multiplanar 2D and 3D post-processing, including now techniques for "virtual endoscopy", lead to discuss new indications in which CT could now compete with conventional X-rays series and videoendoscopy. This precise study of the digestive wall, the peridigestive fat, the digestive tract blood supply, may be performed by MRI, under the condition of access to high level machines and standardized protocols. MR-enteroclysis and MR-virtual colonoscopy could be performed with much lower risk for the patient, in terms of radiation dose or contrast adverse effects. Endoluminal coils should give to MR an ultra-high resolution for analysing the different layers of the gastrointestinal wall. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: to review how to perform CT and MRI protocols for digestive tract imaging, to recognize the CT and MR patterns of the main digestive tract diseases, to discuss the value, limits and role of CT and MR in digestive tract diseases, to discuss the potential role of CT and MR new technological developments for digestive tract imaging in the upcoming future. CONCLUSION: CT is nowadays a modality of choice for digestive imaging. Improvements in technologies and indications, the necessary discussion of the risks and benefits for the patient should let the radiologists consider MRI in gastrointestinal disorders as an important part of the routine activity in clinical MRI.
UNLABELLED: With the introduction of spiral scanning then multidetector technologies, the accuracy for diagnosing digestive tract diseases with CT has been highly improved, and CT is used more and more in the evaluation of patients with suspected gastrointestinal disorders. CT is able to demonstrate both the intramural and the extramural components of the disease, and has a major role in the preoperative staging and the follow-up. Improvements of CT protocols, such as CT-enteroclysis, or multiplanar 2D and 3D post-processing, including now techniques for "virtual endoscopy", lead to discuss new indications in which CT could now compete with conventional X-rays series and videoendoscopy. This precise study of the digestive wall, the peridigestive fat, the digestive tract blood supply, may be performed by MRI, under the condition of access to high level machines and standardized protocols. MR-enteroclysis and MR-virtual colonoscopy could be performed with much lower risk for the patient, in terms of radiation dose or contrast adverse effects. Endoluminal coils should give to MR an ultra-high resolution for analysing the different layers of the gastrointestinal wall. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: to review how to perform CT and MRI protocols for digestive tract imaging, to recognize the CT and MR patterns of the main digestive tract diseases, to discuss the value, limits and role of CT and MR in digestive tract diseases, to discuss the potential role of CT and MR new technological developments for digestive tract imaging in the upcoming future. CONCLUSION: CT is nowadays a modality of choice for digestive imaging. Improvements in technologies and indications, the necessary discussion of the risks and benefits for the patient should let the radiologists consider MRI in gastrointestinal disorders as an important part of the routine activity in clinical MRI.
Authors: C Savoye-Collet; J B Roset; E Koning; C Charpentier; S Hommel; E Lerebours; J N Dacher; G Savoye Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stefania Romano; Elisabetta De Lutio; Gian Andrea Rollandi; Luigia Romano; Roberto Grassi; Dean D T Maglinte Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Barussaud; N Regenet; X Briennon; B de Kerviler; P Pessaux; N Kohneh-Sharhi; P A Lehur; A Hamy; J Leborgne; J C le Neel; E Mirallie Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2005-06-11 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Sabine Schmidt; Patrick Chevallier; Marc Chalaron; Bertrand Bessoud; Francis R Verdun; Philippe Frascarolo; Pierre Schnyder; Alban Denys Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-11-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lars Ny; Hua Li; Shankar Mukherjee; Katarina Persson; Bo Holmqvist; Dazhi Zhao; Vitaliy Shtutin; Huan Huang; Louis M Weiss; Fabiana S Machado; Stephen M Factor; John Chan; Herbert B Tanowitz; Linda A Jelicks Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 2.345