Literature DB >> 12843277

Within- and across-channel processing in auditory masking: a physiological study in the songbird forebrain.

Sonja B Hofer1, Georg M Klump.   

Abstract

Synchronous envelope fluctuations in different frequency ranges of an acoustic background enhance the detection of signals in background noise. This effect, termed comodulation masking release (CMR), is attributed to both processing within one frequency channel of the auditory system and comparisons across separate frequency channels. Here we present data on CMR from a study in field L2 of the auditory forebrain of the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) using two 25-Hz-wide bands of masking noise that provide the opportunity to distinguish between within-channel and across-channel effects. Acoustically evoked responses were recorded from unrestrained birds via radio telemetry. The signal was a 800 msec pure tone presented at the most sensitive frequency of the units in a previously determined frequency-tuning curve (FTC). One band of masking noise was centered on the signal frequency while the flanking band of noise was presented either within the limits of the excitatory FTC (i.e., within the same frequency channel as the on-frequency masker) or in the suppression area of the FTC (i.e., in a separate channel). For flanking bands inside the excitatory FTC, signal detection thresholds based on the rate code were lower in noise maskers with identical envelope fluctuations (comodulated) than in maskers with uncorrelated envelopes resulting in a neural CMR of approximately 4-7 dB. For flanking bands inside the suppression areas, the neural CMR was reduced. Although the average neural CMR was below the behaviorally determined CMR, a subsample of between 11 and 26% of the recording sites resembled the behavioral performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12843277      PMCID: PMC6741263     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

1.  Bilateral multielectrode neurophysiological recordings coupled to local pharmacology in awake songbirds.

Authors:  Liisa A Tremere; Thomas A Terleph; Jin Kwon Jeong; Raphael Pinaud
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Neural correlates of auditory streaming in an objective behavioral task.

Authors:  Naoya Itatani; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Gerlinde Höbel; Noah M Gordon; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 5.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Effects of noise bandwidth and amplitude modulation on masking in frog auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Jozien B M Goense; Albert S Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Yi-Wen Chen; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Comodulation Enhances Signal Detection via Priming of Auditory Cortical Circuits.

Authors:  Joseph Sollini; Paul Chadderton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.