Literature DB >> 12842764

No evidence of dioxin cancer threshold.

David Mackie1, Junfeng Liu, Yeong-Shang Loh, Valerie Thomas.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed an estimate of the human cancer risk from dioxin, using the standard low-dose linear extrapolation approach. This estimate has been controversial because of concern that it may overestimate the cancer risk. An alternative approach has been published and was presented to the U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board's Dioxin Review Panel in November 2000. That approach suggests that dioxin is a threshold carcinogen and that the threshold is an order of magnitude above the exposure levels of the general population. We have reexamined the threshold analysis and found that the data have been incorrectly weighted by cohort size. In our reanalysis, without the incorrect weighting, the threshold effect disappears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12842764      PMCID: PMC1241565          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  Risk assessment for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) based on an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  K Steenland; J Deddens; L Piacitelli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Morbidity study of extruder personnel with potential exposure to brominated dioxins and furans. II. Results of clinical laboratory studies.

Authors:  M G Ott; A Zober
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  The Seveso studies on early and long-term effects of dioxin exposure: a review.

Authors:  P A Bertazzi; I Bernucci; G Brambilla; D Consonni; A C Pesatori
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Cancer mortality in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  M A Fingerhut; W E Halperin; D A Marlow; L A Piacitelli; P A Honchar; M H Sweeney; A L Greife; P A Dill; K Steenland; A J Suruda
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Quantitative cancer risk assessment for dioxins using an occupational cohort.

Authors:  H Becher; K Steindorf; D Flesch-Janys
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Estimation of the cumulated exposure to polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans and standardized mortality ratio analysis of cancer mortality by dose in an occupationally exposed cohort.

Authors:  D Flesch-Janys; K Steindorf; P Gurn; H Becher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Erosion of the integrity of public health science in the USA.

Authors:  R Clapp; P Hoppin; D Kriebel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  The search for non-linear exposure-response relationships at ambient levels in environmental epidemiology.

Authors:  Morton Lippmann
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2005-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.