Pollutant-specific and general lysosomal responses in digestive cells of mussels exposed to model organic chemicals.

The present study was carried out to elucidate whether lysosomal size reduction in digestive cells of mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis constitutes a selective response against a particular group of organic chemical compounds, in contrast to the lysosomal enlargement characteristic of general stress response. Mussels were treated with di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), benzo(a)pyrene (B[a]P), and the water accommodated fraction (WAF) of a lubricant oil, which were daily applied by either injection through the adductor muscle for 7 days or water-exposure for 21 days. Control mussels were either kept untreated in clean sea water, or treated with acetone (injection and water-exposure), vehicle used for DEHP and B[a]P. A third set of controls consisted of mussels with pierced shell kept in clean seawater. Digestive glands were excised at various treatment days and beta-glucuronidase activity was demonstrated in 8-microm cryotome sections. Lysosomal volume, surface and numerical densities, and surface-to-volume ratio were quantified by image analysis. Other sections were stained with oil red 0 to demonstrate neutral lipids and changes in lipid levels were quantified by image analysis. Neutral lipid accumulation in digestive cells was used as a complementary indication of exposure to organic chemicals. It resulted to be a very prompt and all-or-nothing response, which reached a plateau before 1 day of treatment with WAF, DEHP and B[a]P after both injection and water-exposure. DEHP-treatment induced a general stress response characterised by lysosomal enlargement in digestive cells, which was already induced after 1 day. Treatment with either WAF or B[a]P elicited a comparable biphasic response. A transient lysosomal enlargement, shorter with WAF than with B[a]P treatment, was evidenced after both injection and water-exposure. Further, under water-exposure conditions, WAF reduced the endo-lysosomal system in size more markedly than B[a]P. Such lysosomal size reduction constitutes a transient response after exposure to diverse organic xenobiotics (acetone, WAF and B[a]P). In addition, this lysosomal size reduction might be followed by a further lysosomal enlargement, which later might yet again give rise to an apparent lysosomal size reduction under chronic exposure conditions. As a whole, the lysosomal response is intricate and cannot be simply interpreted in environmental pollution monitoring programmes. Nevertheless, it still constitutes a powerful and sensitive biomarker extremely useful as early-warning signal.