Literature DB >> 12842060

Does perineal suturing make a difference? The SUNS trial.

Valerie E M Fleming1, Suzanne Hagen, Catherine Niven.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in outcome between primiparous women who do and who do not have suturing to first or second degree perineal lacerations sustained during spontaneous vaginal births after 37 weeks of gestation.
DESIGN: Parallel group randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Bellshill Maternity Hospital, Lanarkshire, and St John's Hospital, Livingston. POPULATION: Primigravidae with perineal lacerations following spontaneous birth.
METHODS: One thousand and three hundred fourteen women were recruited to the trial antenatally from whom 74 were randomised either to be sutured or not sutured immediately after giving birth. Randomisation was stratified by degree of tear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using standardised measures, perineal pain and healing were measured at 1 and 10 days and 6 weeks postpartum. In addition, postnatal depression was assessed at 10 days and 6 weeks postpartum.
RESULTS: Findings indicated that there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to pain or depression but there were differences with regard to healing. At six weeks, there remained a significant difference in wound closure between the groups, with women who had not been sutured having poorer wound approximation.
CONCLUSIONS: While acknowledging the small sample size, the results are nonetheless important, showing persistent evidence of poorer wound approximation in those women who had not been sutured. Practitioners need to review the present practices of not suturing perineal lacerations until research examining the longer term implications is undertaken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12842060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  8 in total

Review 1.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Julie Frohlich; Christine Kettle
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-10

2.  National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  G Thiagamoorthy; A Johnson; R Thakar; A H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-04-11

Review 4.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-24

Review 5.  Patient-reported outcomes and outcome measures in childbirth perineal trauma research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stergios K Doumouchtsis; Jemina Loganathan; John Fahmy; Gabriele Falconi; Maria Rada; Abdullatif Elfituri; Jorge Milhem Haddad; Vasilios Pergialiotis; Cornelia Betschart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice.

Authors:  Debra E Bick; Khaled M Ismail; Sue Macdonald; Peter Thomas; Sue Tohill; Christine Kettle
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Impact of episiotomy on pelvic floor disorders and their influence on women's wellness after the sixth month postpartum: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Serena Bertozzi; Ambrogio P Londero; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Lorenza Driul; Cristina Delneri; Angelo Calcagno; Paolo Di Benedetto; Diego Marchesoni
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  L Dudley; C Kettle; P W Thomas; K M K Ismail
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.