Literature DB >> 12841420

Prevalence and distribution of hip and knee joint replacements and hip implants in older Americans by the end of life.

David Melzer1, Jack M Guralnik, Dwight Brock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hip and knee replacements have become increasingly common in the older population but the prevalence of these procedures and the potential impact on functioning towards the end of life have not been previously described. The aim of this study was to estimate the rates and distribution of hip and knee joint replacements and hip implants (surgical pins, screws, rods, plates, etc.) in people aged 65 and over who died in the US in 1993, and to measure mobility outcomes during their last year of life.
METHODS: Data were drawn from the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey; 7684 deaths in people aged 65 years or over were included. From these data full informant interviews were available for 6586 (86%). Three hundred and forty-four decedents had hip joint replacements, 357 had hip implants, and 102 had knee joint replacements. Replicate methods were used to obtain weighted estimates for all decedents in the 1993 US base population.
RESULTS: Of female and male decedents, 15.5% (95% CI: 14.3-16.7) and 6.1% (95% CI: 3.9-8.2), respectively, had received the studied devices. About 80% of these had been implanted more than a year before death. There were large differences in the risks of receiving a hip joint replacement or a hip implant depending on gender, education and race. About 60% of recipients either had no difficulty in getting around their own homes during the last year of life or had difficulty lasting less than 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Implanted hip and knee devices were common in older people who died in the US in 1993. Large sociodemographic differences in those who received vs those who did not were present at the end of life. While difficulty in walking is the main indication for joint replacements, a majority of those receiving replacements experienced less than 6 months of mobility difficulties in their own homes during the last year of their lives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12841420     DOI: 10.1007/bf03324481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  11 in total

1.  Reductions in disability prevalence among the highest income groups of older Brazilians.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Parahyba; Kara Stevens; William Henley; Iain A Lang; David Melzer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Social determinants and osteoarthritis outcomes.

Authors:  My-Linh N Luong; Rebecca J Cleveland; Kirsten A Nyrop; Leigh F Callahan
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2012-08-01

3.  Shaped, stratified, scaffold-free grafts for articular cartilage defects.

Authors:  EunHee Han; Won C Bae; Nancy D Hsieh-Bonassera; Van W Wong; Barbara L Schumacher; Simon Görtz; Koichi Masuda; William D Bugbee; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Cross-sectional analysis of association between socioeconomic status and utilization of primary total hip joint replacements 2006-7: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Sharon L Brennan; Tyman Stanford; Anita E Wluka; Margaret J Henry; Richard S Page; Stephen E Graves; Mark A Kotowicz; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Julie A Pasco
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-03-16

6.  Effect of risedronate on joint structure and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: results of the BRISK randomized, controlled trial [ISRCTN01928173].

Authors:  Tim D Spector; Philip G Conaghan; J Christopher Buckland-Wright; Patrick Garnero; Gary A Cline; John F Beary; David J Valent; Joan M Meyer
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Associations between socioeconomic status and primary total knee joint replacements performed for osteoarthritis across Australia 2003-10: data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Sharon L Brennan; Stephen E Lane; Michelle Lorimer; Rachelle Buchbinder; Anita E Wluka; Richard S Page; Richard H Osborne; Julie A Pasco; Kerrie M Sanders; Kara Cashman; Peter R Ebeling; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Predictors of periprosthetic fracture after total knee replacement: an analysis of 21,723 cases.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Matthew Jensen; David Lewallen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Utilisation of primary total knee joint replacements across socioeconomic status in the Barwon Statistical Division, Australia, 2006-2007: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sharon Lee Brennan; Tyman Stanford; Anita E Wluka; Richard S Page; Stephen E Graves; Mark A Kotowicz; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Julie A Pasco
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Validation of a screening questionnaire for hip and knee osteoarthritis in old people.

Authors:  José M Quintana; Inmaculada Arostegui; Antonio Escobar; Iratxe Lafuente; Juan C Arenaza; Isidoro Garcia; Urko Aguirre
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.