Literature DB >> 12840914

The value of in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging.

H Xu1, D Jiang, L Yang, Y Xiong, F Yang, X Kong.   

Abstract

The value of the combined in-phase (IP) and opposed-phase (OP) T1-weighted (T1-W) breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging, especially for fat content, was evaluated. Non-contrast-enhanced IP and OP T1-W GRE breath-hold images were obtained in 76 patients refereed for abdominal MRI at 1.5T. 76 patients were divided into three groups for analysis: (1) liver without mass (n = 8); (2) liver with hepatoma (n = 34); (3) liver with haemangioma or cyst (n = 34). Liver/spleen and liver/lesion signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed for lesion detection. Images between IP and OP sequences were compared quantitatively. The results showed that there was not statistically significant difference in liver/spleen and liver/lesion SNR between IP and OP sequences. In the patients with fatty infiltration, the OP sequences yielded substantially lower values for liver/spleen and liver/lesion SNR than those of the IP sequences. Furthermore, OP imaging showed fatty infiltration in 14 cases and demonstrated hyperintense peritumor rim in 4 cases. In 14 cases of fatty infiltration, many lesions were identified using IP images. The use of IP and OP GRE sequences provides complementary diagnostic information for hepatic lesions and fat content. Focal hepatic lesions may be obscured in the setting of fatty infiltration if only OP sequences are employed. A complete assessment of the liver with MR should include both IP and OP imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 12840914     DOI: 10.1007/bf02888182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ        ISSN: 0257-716X


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase GRE and conventional SE MR pulse sequences in T1-weighted imaging of liver lesions.

Authors:  J Martín; M Sentis; J Puig; M Rué; J Falcó; L Donoso; A Zidan
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Fatty metamorphosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic features in 10 cases.

Authors:  J Yoshikawa; O Matsui; T Takashima; M Ida; T Takanaka; I Kawamura; K Kakuda; S Miyata
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Fatty metamorphosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with chemical shift gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  J Martín; M Sentís; A Zidan; L Donoso; J Puig; J Falcó; R Bella
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  CT findings in hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of tumor characteristics with causative factors, tumor size, and histologic tumor grade.

Authors:  W R Stevens; C D Johnson; D H Stephens; K P Batts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: reduced frequency of typical findings with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in a non-Asian population.

Authors:  P C Freeny; R L Baron; S A Teefey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Multiple hepatorenal angiomyolipomas: diagnosis with fat suppression, gadolinium-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  L D Hooper; P J Mergo; P R Ros
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec

7.  Adenomatous hyperplasia in the vicinity of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  A Eguchi; O Nakashima; S Okudaira; S Sugihara; M Kojiro
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Benign adrenocortical masses: diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging.

Authors:  D G Mitchell; M Crovello; T Matteucci; R O Petersen; M M Miettinen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.105

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.