Literature DB >> 12840811

In vivo electroporation of the testis versus transgenic mice model in functional studies of spermatocyte-specific hst70 gene promoter: A comparative study.

Wiesława Widłak1, Dorota Scieglińska, Natalia Vydra, Ewa Małusecka, Zdzisław Krawczyk.   

Abstract

To determine whether DNA transfer to mouse testes by in vivo electroporation could be useful method for studying regulatory elements of genes specifically active in spermatocytes first we compared the expression pattern of a construct containing the EGFP reporter gene ligated to a fragment of the heat shock testis-specific hst70 gene promoter, both in testis of transgenic mice and in testis electroporated in vivo. While in transgenic mice the EGFP was expressed in all seminiferous tubules in a cell- and stage-specific manner, in the testes electroporated in vivo only small fraction of cells expressed this marker protein. In order to make a quantitative comparison between the specificity of these two experimental systems we used several vectors containing the CAT gene ligated to fragments of the hst70 gene 5' upstream of DNA sequences which either promoted or did not activate expression of the reporter gene in the testes of transgenic mice. Also, as a reference opposite to spermatogenic cells we examined the expression pattern of the same set of vectors in the rat hepatoma FTO 2B cells. Although electroporated testes retain some spermatocyte-specific features such as the ability to repress promoters which do not contain regulatory elements responsible for testis-specific transcription, several important drawbacks of the method are evident. They include basal activity of constructs which are not transcribed in testes of transgenic mice and low overall transfection efficiency. This may hamper studies in which subtle changes in the expression pattern are under investigation. However, the in vivo electroporation of the testis can be useful for preliminary screening of constructs aimed to study in transgenic mice. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12840811     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.10305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  6 in total

1.  Improved Specificity of Gene Electrotransfer to Skin Using pDNA Under the Control of Collagen Tissue-Specific Promoter.

Authors:  Spela Kos; Natasa Tesic; Urska Kamensek; Tanja Blagus; Maja Cemazar; Simona Kranjc; Jaka Lavrencak; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Transgene-mediated rescue of spermatogenesis in Cldn11-null mice.

Authors:  Xin Wu; Marcello Peppi; Matthew J Vengalil; Kathleen J Maheras; Cherie M Southwood; Michael Bradley; Alexander Gow
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Seminiferous tubule transfection in vitro to define post-meiotic gene regulation.

Authors:  Sandra Danner; Christiane Kirchhoff; Richard Ivell
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  MicroRNA-34c enhances murine male germ cell apoptosis through targeting ATF1.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Liang; Doudou Zhou; Chao Wei; Haoshu Luo; Jiali Liu; Rui Fu; Sheng Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Expression, function, and regulation of the testis-enriched heat shock HSPA2 gene in rodents and humans.

Authors:  Dorota Scieglinska; Zdzislaw Krawczyk
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Gene silencing by RNAi in mouse Sertoli cells.

Authors:  Emilio González-González; Pedro P López-Casas; Jesús Del Mazo
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.211

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.