Literature DB >> 12840216

The use of genetically altered mice for breast cancer prevention studies.

Claudine Kavanaugh1, Jeffrey E Green.   

Abstract

Chemoprevention through nutritional and dietary changes may offer an important means of inhibiting the development and progression of breast cancer, which would have a major impact on public health. Studies to assess the efficacy of potential chemopreventive compounds are difficult to perform in large human populations, whereas the use of genetically engineered mice (GEM) for preclinical testing offers several advantages. GEM models can be utilized to assess the inhibitory effects of nutritional and chemopreventive agents on well-defined oncogenic signaling pathways. Because several transgenic mouse models progress through a well-defined temporal series of stages leading to invasive carcinoma formation, they may be particularly useful for determining cancer stage-specific responses to nutritional and chemopreventive agents. The C3(1)SV40 T/t-antigen transgenic mouse mammary cancer model has been utilized for chemopreventive research in which mammary tumors develop over a well-characterized time course. Several compounds have been shown to inhibit mammary tumor development in this model, including retinoids, di-fluoromethylornithine (DFMO), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), antiangiogenic compounds and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID). All of the chemopreventive agents used in the C3(1)Tag mammary mouse model appear to affect the promotion stage of tumorigenesis, suggesting that these agents may be useful in inhibiting the transition of human ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive carcinoma. Selective combinations of chemopreventive agents may be particularly useful for targeting multiple signaling pathways involved in cancer development and progression leading to improved clinical responses. The application of gene expression profiling to chemopreventive studies will aid in the selection of appropriate models for preclinical testing and further define mechanisms of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12840216     DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.7.2404S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  12 in total

1.  MRI reveals increased tumorigenesis following high fat feeding in a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Devkumar Mustafi; Sully Fernandez; Erica Markiewicz; Xiaobing Fan; Marta Zamora; Jeffrey Mueller; Matthew J Brady; Suzanne D Conzen; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Magnetic resonance angiography reveals increased arterial blood supply and tumorigenesis following high fat feeding in a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Devkumar Mustafi; Rebecca Valek; Michael Fitch; Victoria Werner; Xiaobing Fan; Erica Markiewicz; Sully Fernandez; Marta Zamora; Jeffrey Mueller; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Suzanne D Conzen; Matthew J Brady; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Pathologic progression of mammary carcinomas in a C3(1)/SV40 T/t-antigen transgenic rat model of human triple-negative and Her2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Hoenerhoff; M A Shibata; A Bode; J E Green
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Role of dietary bioactive natural products in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Ji Bak; Soumyasri Das Gupta; Joseph Wahler; Nanjoo Suh
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 15.707

5.  Benefits of exercise training on breast cancer progression and inflammation in C3(1)SV40Tag mice.

Authors:  E A Murphy; J M Davis; T L Barrilleaux; J L McClellan; J L Steiner; M D Carmichael; M M Pena; J R Hebert; J E Green
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 6.  Harnessing preclinical mouse models to inform human clinical cancer trials.

Authors:  David H Gutmann; Kim Hunter-Schaedle; Kevin M Shannon
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  In vivo positron-emission tomography imaging of progression and transformation in a mouse model of mammary neoplasia.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Alexander D Borowsky; Erik T McGoldrick; Jeffrey P Gregg; Jeannie E Maglione; Robert D Cardiff; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Models for prevention and treatment of cancer: problems vs promises.

Authors:  Bharat B Aggarwal; Divya Danda; Shan Gupta; Prashasnika Gehlot
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the natural history of in situ mammary neoplasia in transgenic mice: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Suzanne D Conzen; Xiaobing Fan; Erica J Markiewicz; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP imaging, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Maddalena T Tilli; Angela R Parrish; Ion Cotarla; Laundette P Jones; Michael D Johnson; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.