Literature DB >> 12839155

Adverse pregnancy outcome in women exposed to acyclovir during pregnancy: a population-based observational study.

Chaveewan Ratanajamit1, Mette Vinther Skriver, Peter Jepsen, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong, Jørn Olsen, Henrik Toft Sørensen.   

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in children born to mothers who redeemed a prescription for systemic or topical acyclovir during pregnancy. Data on prescriptions of acyclovir were obtained from the Danish North Jutland Prescription Database and data on pregnancy outcomes from the Danish Medical Birth Registry and the County Hospital Discharge Registry. The risk of malformations, low birth weight, preterm birth and stillbirth in users of acyclovir were compared with non-exposed women using a follow-up design, while the risk of spontaneous abortion was examined using a case-control design. 90 pregnant women had redeemed a prescription for systemic acyclovir, and 995 women for topical acyclovir, during 30 d before conception, or during their pregnancies from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2001. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of the exposed relative to the non-exposed for the systemic and topical acyclovir were: malformations, 0.69 (0.17-2.82) and 0.84 (0.51, 1.39); low birth weight, 2.03 (0.50-8.35) and 0.48 (0.21-1.07); preterm birth, 1.04 (0.38-2.85) and 0.95 (0.70-1.28); stillbirth (for topical acyclovir), 1.70 (0.80-3.60); and spontaneous abortion, 2.16 (0.60-7.80) and 1.29 (0.80-3.60). There is increasing evidence that the use of systemic acyclovir is not associated with an increased prevalence of malformations at birth and preterm delivery. The data for low birth weight and spontaneous abortion are still inconclusive, although the risk of spontaneous abortion is increased in women exposed to acyclovir during the first month of pregnancy. The use of topical acyclovir does not seem to be associated with any adverse pregnancy outcome, although data on stillbirth are inconclusive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12839155     DOI: 10.1080/00365540310000229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0036-5548


  5 in total

1.  Herpes simplex virus 2 infection rate and necessity of screening during pregnancy: a clinical and seroepidemiologic study.

Authors:  Il Dong Kim; Ho Sun Chang; Kyung Jin Hwang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  Acyclovir exposure and birth defects: an important advance, but more are needed.

Authors:  James L Mills; Tonia C Carter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Varicella-zoster virus (chickenpox) infection in pregnancy.

Authors:  Ronald F Lamont; Jack D Sobel; D Carrington; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Edi Vaisbuch; Roberto Romero
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  Microbiology laboratory and the management of mother-child varicella-zoster virus infection.

Authors:  Massimo De Paschale; Pierangelo Clerici
Journal:  World J Virol       Date:  2016-08-12

5.  Antiherpetic medication use and the risk of gastroschisis: findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Katherine A Ahrens; Marlene T Anderka; Marcia L Feldkamp; Mark A Canfield; Allen A Mitchell; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.980

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.