Literature DB >> 12838544

Proteomic tools for quantitation by mass spectrometry.

Jennie Lill1.   

Abstract

Techniques for the quantitation of proteins and peptides by mass spectrometry (MS) are reviewed. A range of labeling processes is discussed, including metabolic, enzymatic, and chemical labeling, and techniques that can be employed for comparative and absolute quantitation are presented. Advantages and drawbacks of the techniques are discussed, and suggestions for the appropriate uses of the methodologies are explained. Overall, the metabolic incorporation of isotopic labels provides the most accurate labeling strategy, and is most useful when an internal standard for comparative quantitation is needed. However, that technique is limited to research that uses cultured cells. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 22:182-194, 2003; Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mas.10048

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12838544     DOI: 10.1002/mas.10048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev        ISSN: 0277-7037            Impact factor:   10.946


  29 in total

1.  Relative quantitation of protein nitration by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using isotope-coded dimethyl labeling and chemoprecipitation.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Katalin Prokai-Tatrai; Laszlo Prokai
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Mass spectrometry reveals specific and global molecular transformations during viral infection.

Authors:  Eden P Go; William R Wikoff; Zhouxin Shen; Grace O'Maille; Hirotoshi Morita; Thomas P Conrads; Anders Nordstrom; Sunia A Trauger; Wilasinee Uritboonthai; David A Lucas; King C Chan; Timothy D Veenstra; Hanna Lewicki; Michael B Oldstone; Anette Schneemann; Gary Siuzdak
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; George P Daston; Sigmund J Degitz; Nancy D Denslow; Robert A Hoke; Sean W Kennedy; Ann L Miracle; Edward J Perkins; Jason Snape; Donald E Tillitt; Charles R Tyler; Donald Versteeg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Improving gene annotation using peptide mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Stephen Tanner; Zhouxin Shen; Julio Ng; Liliana Florea; Roderic Guigó; Steven P Briggs; Vineet Bafna
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Normalization approaches for removing systematic biases associated with mass spectrometry and label-free proteomics.

Authors:  Stephen J Callister; Richard C Barry; Joshua N Adkins; Ethan T Johnson; Wei-Jun Qian; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Richard D Smith; Mary S Lipton
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Improved infrared multiphoton dissociation of peptides through N-terminal phosphonite derivatization.

Authors:  Lisa A Vasicek; Jeffrey J Wilson; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  LC-MS Based Detection of Differential Protein Expression.

Authors:  Leepika Tuli; Habtom W Ressom
Journal:  J Proteomics Bioinform       Date:  2009-10-02

8.  Isotope-coded dimethyl tagging for differential quantification of posttranslational protein carbonylation by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, an end-product of lipid peroxidation.

Authors:  Navin Rauniyar; Laszlo Prokai
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.982

9.  A quantitative proteomics analysis of subcellular proteome localization and changes induced by DNA damage.

Authors:  François-Michel Boisvert; Yun Wah Lam; Douglas Lamont; Angus I Lamond
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  MRM screening/biomarker discovery with linear ion trap MS: a library of human cancer-specific peptides.

Authors:  Xu Yang; Iulia M Lazar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.