Literature DB >> 12838390

Comparison of selection methods for optimizing genetic gain and gene diversity in a red pine ( Pinus resinosa Ait.) seedling seed orchard.

A David1, C Pike, R Stine.   

Abstract

Four selection methods, individual selection (IS), family selection (FS), family plus within-family selection (FWFS) and combined selection (CS), were used to estimate genetic gain [ E( g)] for stem volume and gene diversity ( GD) for ten theoretical selection intensities in a 108-family, 12-year-old red pine seedling seed orchard. Estimated genetic gain for stem volume ranged from 4.6% to 11.8% across all selection methods and intensities with CS consistently having the highest gains and FS the lowest for any given selection intensity. Genetic diversity ranged from 0.9797 to 0.9954 across all selection methods and intensities. Individual selection was the best selection method for retaining GD, especially at the higher selection intensities, while FWFS was more efficient at the lowest selection intensity. An optimization point, which maximized E( g) and GD relative to each other, was calculated for each selection method. In all cases the optimization point indicated that both E( g) and GD would be favorably high when optimized relative to each other. The implications for volume gain, genetic diversity and potential inbreeding in red pine, a species with inherently low levels of genetic variation, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12838390     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1330-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  5 in total

1.  Deployment to plantations of numbers and proportions of clones with special emphasis on maximizing gain at a constant diversity.

Authors:  D Lindgren; W S Libby; F L Bondesson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Expected gain and status number following restricted individual and combined-index selection.

Authors:  R P Wei; F C Yeh; D Lindgren
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  An experimental comparison of individual, family and combination selection.

Authors:  S P Wilson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Comparison of evaluation-selection systems for maximizing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding.

Authors:  M Quinton; C Smith
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The joint regulation of genetic gain and inbreeding under mate selection.

Authors:  H M Klieve; B P Kinghorn; S A Barwick
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  1994-01-12       Impact factor: 2.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.