Alexandra M Minnis1, Stephen C Shiboski, Nancy S Padian. 1. Center for Reproductive Health Research & Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco 94105, USA. aminnis@psg.ucsf.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The need for safe and effective female-controlled methods that protect against sexually transmitted pathogens is widely recognized. Product effectiveness is inextricably bound to use, and, therefore, the needs and preferences of potential consumers must be considered. The degree to which measures of acceptability correlate with actual barrier method use remains unexamined. GOAL: The goal was to evaluate associations between measures of acceptability and use of existing over-the-counter barrier methods. STUDY DESIGN: In the San Francisco Bay Area, 510 females aged 15 to 30 years were recruited from reproductive health clinics for this longitudinal study. RESULTS: Neither hypothetical acceptability nor product choice predicted use. Fewer than 50% of participants who chose a female-controlled method used it. Similarly, method satisfaction was not associated with use (14.3-51.4% of satisfied users used the method again). However, dissatisfaction was predictive of low levels of subsequent use (0-15.3% used the method again). Male condoms were used despite dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: The lack of association among assessments of acceptability, choice, satisfaction, and use suggests a need to reframe how product acceptability is evaluated in prevention research so it is more predictive of method use.
BACKGROUND: The need for safe and effective female-controlled methods that protect against sexually transmitted pathogens is widely recognized. Product effectiveness is inextricably bound to use, and, therefore, the needs and preferences of potential consumers must be considered. The degree to which measures of acceptability correlate with actual barrier method use remains unexamined. GOAL: The goal was to evaluate associations between measures of acceptability and use of existing over-the-counter barrier methods. STUDY DESIGN: In the San Francisco Bay Area, 510 females aged 15 to 30 years were recruited from reproductive health clinics for this longitudinal study. RESULTS: Neither hypothetical acceptability nor product choice predicted use. Fewer than 50% of participants who chose a female-controlled method used it. Similarly, method satisfaction was not associated with use (14.3-51.4% of satisfied users used the method again). However, dissatisfaction was predictive of low levels of subsequent use (0-15.3% used the method again). Male condoms were used despite dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: The lack of association among assessments of acceptability, choice, satisfaction, and use suggests a need to reframe how product acceptability is evaluated in prevention research so it is more predictive of method use.
Authors: Elizabeth G Raymond; Pai Lien Chen; Sean Condon; Joanne Luoto; Kurt T Barnhart; Mitchell D Creinin; Alfred Poindexter; Livia Wan; Mark Martens; Robert Schenken; Richard Blackwell Journal: Contraception Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Elizabeth A Bukusi; Maria F Gallo; Anjali Sharma; Betty Njoroge; Denise J Jamieson; Rosemary Nguti; April J Bell; David A Eschenbach Journal: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-03-07
Authors: Marian Reiff; Christine Wade; Maria T Chao; Fredi Kronenberg; Linda F Cushman Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Kathleen M Morrow; Joseph L Fava; Rochelle K Rosen; Anna L Christensen; Sara Vargas; Candelaria Barroso Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Elizabeth T Montgomery; Helen Cheng; Ariane van der Straten; Agnes C Chidanyika; Naomi Lince; Kelly Blanchard; Gita Ramjee; Busisiwe Nkala; Nancy S Padian Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2009-09-10