Literature DB >> 12837980

Long-term prognosis of stage I ovarian carcinoma. Prognostic importance of intraoperative rupture.

Mika Mizuno1, Fumitaka Kikkawa, Kiyosumi Shibata, Hiroaki Kajiyama, Takahiro Suzuki, Kazuhiko Ino, Michiyasu Kawai, Shigehiko Mizutani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There are a few long-term follow-up studies of patients with stage I ovarian carcinoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors for long-term survival.
METHODS: Two hundred fourteen stage I ovarian carcinomas (registered by the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group from 1988 to 1999) were analyzed. Staging according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics was set without considering the pathologic findings of the lymph nodes. Stage Ic was divided into Ic(b) and other Ic.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were stage Ia, 2 were stage Ib, and 138 were stage Ic, consisting of 75 Ic(b) and 63 other Ic patients. The ratios of stage Ic to Ia and stage Ic(b) to Ic were highest in clear-cell adenocarcinoma among histologies analyzed. There were significant differences in disease-free survival curves between each group. In clear cell adenocarcinoma, there was a significant difference in disease- free survival curves between stage Ic(b) and other Ic (p = 0.0373), while this tendency was also observed in other histologies except for mucinous carcinoma. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that substage was a significant prognostic factor of both disease-free and overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Stage Ic(b) patients showed poorer survival than stage Ia patients but better than survival in other Ic. Thus, cautious treatment of ovarian tumor during surgery is quite important to avoid rupture. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12837980     DOI: 10.1159/000071202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  7 in total

1.  Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Lil Valentin; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Antonia C Testa; Tom Bourne; Sabine Van Huffel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Ovarian clear cell carcinoma, outcomes by stage: the MSK experience.

Authors:  Catherine A Shu; Qin Zhou; Anjali R Jotwani; Alexia Iasonos; Mario M Leitao; Jason A Konner; Carol A Aghajanian
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective multicentre experience of 254 patients with complete surgical staging.

Authors:  M Takano; Y Kikuchi; N Yaegashi; K Kuzuya; M Ueki; H Tsuda; M Suzuki; J Kigawa; S Takeuchi; H Tsuda; T Moriya; T Sugiyama
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Adnexal masses suspected to be benign treated with laparoscopy.

Authors:  Richard H Demir; Greg J Marchand
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Spontaneous rupture of ovarian cystadenocarcinoma: pre- and post-rupture computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  Priscila Silveira Salvadori; Lucas Novais Bomfim; Augusto Castelli von Atzingen; Giuseppe D'Ippolito
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct

6.  Safety of fertility-sparing surgery in primary mucinous carcinoma of the ovary.

Authors:  Jung-Yun Lee; Yu Ri Jo; Tae Hun Kim; Hee Seung Kim; Min A Kim; Jae Weon Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Clear cell carcinomas of the ovary: a mono-institutional study of 73 cases in China with an analysis of the prognostic significance of clinicopathological parameters and IMP3 expression.

Authors:  Rui Bi; Xuxia Shen; Weiwei Zhang; Yufan Cheng; Zheng Feng; Xu Cai; Wentao Yang
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.644

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.