Literature DB >> 12837612

Naturalness and the genetic modification of animals.

Henk Verhoog1.   

Abstract

In the past few years it has been recognised that so-called intrinsic concerns about genetic modification (GM) of plants and animals, for food in particular, have an important role in the public perception of GM. One of these concerns is the view that GM is 'unnatural'. This article gives an overview of the often conflicting views on the argument of unnaturalness in books and reports. The author gives a new direction to this discussion, by contrasting the common sense view of nature and animals, with the scientific concept of nature and what is natural. The view of nature and what is natural is always normative. This is illustrated by making explicit the concept of nature in organic farming, which explains why GM is rejected.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12837612     DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00142-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN: 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  6 in total

1.  Ethical Discourse about the Modification of Food for Therapeutic Purposes: How Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases View the Good, the Bad, and the Healthy.

Authors:  Krista L Harrison; Gail Geller; Patricia Marshall; Jon Tilburt; Marybeth Mercer; Margaret A Brinich; Janelle Highland; Ruth M Farrell; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 2.  Re-interpreting some common objections to three transgenic applications: GM foods, xenotransplantation and germ line gene modification (GLGM).

Authors:  Lucy Carter
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Should we enhance animals?

Authors:  S Chan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Crop improvement through modification of the plant's own genome.

Authors:  Caius M Rommens; Jaime M Humara; Jingsong Ye; Hua Yan; Craig Richael; Lynda Zhang; Rachel Perry; Kathleen Swords
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Public attitudes towards genetically modified polled cattle.

Authors:  Emilie McConnachie; Maria Jose Hötzel; Jesse A Robbins; Adam Shriver; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Use of transgenic animals to improve human health and animal production.

Authors:  L-M Houdebine
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.005

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.