Literature DB >> 12836918

Comparison of computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex.

Rafal Bogacz1, Malcolm W Brown.   

Abstract

This study compares the efficiency and plausibility of published computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Substantial evidence indicates that the perirhinal cortex is involved in both the familiarity discrimination aspect of recognition memory and in perceptual functions involved with representations of complete stimuli (i.e., object identification). Published models of how the perirhinal cortex may perform familiarity discrimination can be divided into two groups. The first group assumes that a proportion of perirhinal neurons form a network specialised just for familiarity discrimination (these models may be based on Hebbian or anti-Hebbian synaptic plasticity). In contrast, the second group assumes that both familiarity discrimination and learning representations of complete stimuli are performed within a single combined network. This study establishes that when the responses of neurons that provide input to the familiarity discrimination network are correlated (as indicated by experimental data), specialised networks based on anti-Hebbian learning may recognise the previous occurrence of many more stimuli (i.e., have a capacity up to thousands of times larger) than specialised networks based on Hebbian learning. The currently published combined models do not learn an optimal stimulus representation (they do not fully extract statistically independent features), and hence their capacities are even lower than those of the specialised models based on Hebbian learning. Hence, the combined models published thus far are critically less efficient than the specialised models based on anti-Hebbian learning. This study also compares the consistency of the models with experimental observations concerning what is known of synaptic plasticity in the perirhinal cortex and the responses of its neurons. Many theoretically important parameters remain undetermined, and experiments are suggested to provide information critical for refining and distinguishing between the various models. However, the above theoretical arguments and currently published data favour the existence of a separate network specialised for familiarity discrimination.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12836918     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.10093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  30 in total

1.  A Stimulus-Oriented Approach to Memory.

Authors:  Robert Sekuler; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-11-21

2.  An analysis of the mean theta phase of population activity in a model of hippocampal region CA1.

Authors:  Eric A Zilli; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Network       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.273

3.  Lexico-semantic structure and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.

Authors:  Joseph D Monaco; L F Abbott; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Mechanisms underlying working memory for novel information.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  cAMP responsive element-binding protein phosphorylation is necessary for perirhinal long-term potentiation and recognition memory.

Authors:  E Clea Warburton; Colin P J Glover; Peter V Massey; Humin Wan; Ben Johnson; Alison Bienemann; Ule Deuschle; James N C Kew; John P Aggleton; Zafar I Bashir; James Uney; Malcolm W Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  How hippocampus and cortex contribute to recognition memory: revisiting the complementary learning systems model.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  The Role of Hierarchical Dynamical Functions in Coding for Episodic Memory and Cognition.

Authors:  Holger Dannenberg; Andrew S Alexander; Jennifer C Robinson; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Human medial temporal lobe neurons respond preferentially to personally relevant images.

Authors:  Indre V Viskontas; Rodrigo Quian Quiroga; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Responses of neurons in the medial temporal lobe during encoding and recognition of face-scene pairs.

Authors:  Indre V Viskontas; Barbara J Knowlton; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Visual working memory and delay activity in highly selective neurons in the inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.