Anandi V Law1, Max D Ray, Katherine K Knapp, Jeffrey K Balesh. 1. Center for Pharmacy Practice Research and Development, College of Pharmacy, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA 91766-1854, USA. alaw@westernu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the perception of unmet needs in the medication use process from the perspectives of three of the principal participants in the process--physicians, pharmacists, and patients--and to identify the individual(s) or strategy(ies) perceived to be the best or most likely candidate(s) to resolve the problems identified. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians (primary care, cardiology, oncology, and obstetrics/gynecology specialties), pharmacists (community and health-system settings), and patients from four medium-sized U.S. cities. The survey instrument was modified for each group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The medication use process was divided into nine steps, based on a previous study. A two-part question was framed for each step. In part A, respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement (on a 5-point scale) about whether the step was being conducted appropriately. In part B, those who disagreed with a statement in part A were asked their opinions on the best possible candidate or strategy for improving that step. RESULTS: Both physicians and pharmacists identified four areas of unmet needs: timing of physician visit, patient counseling, patient use of medications, and patient monitoring. Each group held itself primarily responsible for the resolution of most of these problems. Patients did not identify any unmet needs from the survey. In responses to open-ended questions, however, they cited medication cost, appropriateness, access, and convenience as problems. CONCLUSION: Providers and patients reported substantially different perspectives on medication use problems and on improving the process. Addressing the unmet needs identified in this study will require better understanding, communication, and collaboration among physicians, pharmacists, and patients.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the perception of unmet needs in the medication use process from the perspectives of three of the principal participants in the process--physicians, pharmacists, and patients--and to identify the individual(s) or strategy(ies) perceived to be the best or most likely candidate(s) to resolve the problems identified. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians (primary care, cardiology, oncology, and obstetrics/gynecology specialties), pharmacists (community and health-system settings), and patients from four medium-sized U.S. cities. The survey instrument was modified for each group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The medication use process was divided into nine steps, based on a previous study. A two-part question was framed for each step. In part A, respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement (on a 5-point scale) about whether the step was being conducted appropriately. In part B, those who disagreed with a statement in part A were asked their opinions on the best possible candidate or strategy for improving that step. RESULTS: Both physicians and pharmacists identified four areas of unmet needs: timing of physician visit, patient counseling, patient use of medications, and patient monitoring. Each group held itself primarily responsible for the resolution of most of these problems. Patients did not identify any unmet needs from the survey. In responses to open-ended questions, however, they cited medication cost, appropriateness, access, and convenience as problems. CONCLUSION: Providers and patients reported substantially different perspectives on medication use problems and on improving the process. Addressing the unmet needs identified in this study will require better understanding, communication, and collaboration among physicians, pharmacists, and patients.
Authors: Derjung M Tarn; Debora A Paterniti; Bradley R Williams; Camille S Cipri; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-01-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rob J Fredericksen; Todd C Edwards; Jessica S Merlin; Laura E Gibbons; Deepa Rao; D Scott Batey; Lydia Dant; Edgar Páez; Anna Church; Paul K Crane; Heidi M Crane; Donald L Patrick Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2015-08-25
Authors: Jennifer L Adams; Anandi V Law; Brian Kawahara; Donald A Godwin; Joel C Marrs; Leigh Ann Ross; Nicole Rodin; Allie Jo Shipman; Jasey Cárdenas Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Jeanine A Driesenaar; Peter Agm De Smet; Rolf van Hulten; Litje Hu; Sandra van Dulmen Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2016-11-02 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Elke Ge Mathijssen; Johanna E Vriezekolk; Agnes Mm Eijsbouts; Frank Hj van den Hoogen; Bart Jf van den Bemt Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 2.711