Literature DB >> 12836515

The discrepancy between self-reported smoking status and urine continine levels among women enrolled in prenatal care at four publicly funded clinical sites.

David A Webb1, Neal R Boyd, Darlene Messina, Richard A Windsor.   

Abstract

The discrepancy between self-reported smoking behavior and actual urine cotinine values among prenatal patients at four municipally operated clinical sites was examined. Face-to-face interview and birth certificate information about smoking behavior during pregnancy was compared with laboratory urine cotinine values for 74 patients. Almost three of every four (73%) self-reported nonsmokers had continine values greater than 80 ng/mL; one-half (48%) had values exceeding 100 ng/mL. Self-reported prenatal smoking behavior seems to be an unreliable indicator of actual smoking status among low-income prenatal patients, resulting in missed opportunities to lower tobacco-related exposure/risk among women with the poorest birth outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12836515     DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200307000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  40 in total

1.  Nicotine and metabolites in meconium as evidence of maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and predictors of neonatal growth deficits.

Authors:  Teresa R Gray; Rina D Eiden; Kenneth E Leonard; Gerard Connors; Shannon Shisler; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Prenatal hair nicotine analysis in homes with multiple smokers.

Authors:  Kristin Ashford; Susan Westneat
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 1.208

3.  The impact of prenatal parental tobacco smoking on risk of diabetes mellitus in middle-aged women.

Authors:  M A La Merrill; P M Cirillo; N Y Krigbaum; B A Cohn
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Who conceals their smoking status from their health care provider?

Authors:  Jennifer Stuber; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Decline in smoking during pregnancy in New York City, 1995-2005.

Authors:  Cheryl R Stein; Jennifer A Ellis; David A Savitz; Laura Vichinsky; Sarah B Perl
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Prevalence and predictors of smoking and quitting during pregnancy in Serbia: results of a nationally representative survey.

Authors:  Srmena Krstev; Jelena Marinković; Snežana Simić; Nikola Kocev; Susan J Bondy
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  The influence of maternal smoking and exposure to residential ETS on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective national study.

Authors:  Srmena Krstev; Jelena Marinković; Snežana Simić; Nikola Kocev; Susan J Bondy
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-11

8.  Accuracy of prenatal smoking data from Washington State birth certificates in a population-based sample with cotinine measurements.

Authors:  Susan Searles Nielsen; Russell L Dills; Michael Glass; Beth A Mueller
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Predictors of Six-month Change in the Voice Handicap Index in a Treatment-seeking Population.

Authors:  Jaime Moore; Caprice Greenberg; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Prenatal smoking prevalence ascertained from two population-based data sources: birth certificates and PRAMS questionnaires, 2004.

Authors:  Alicia M Allen; Patricia M Dietz; Van T Tong; Lucinda England; Cheryl B Prince
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.