Literature DB >> 12835963

Radiogenic risks from hysterosalpingography.

Kostas Perisinakis1, John Damilakis, John Grammatikakis, Nicholas Theocharopoulos, Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine ovarian dose, effective dose and associated radiogenic risks from hysterosalpingography (HSG), and to provide data for the estimation of radiogenic risks related to HSG studies performed in any laboratory. The fluoroscopy time, number of radiographs taken and entrance surface dose were measured in a series of 78 consecutive patients undergoing HSG as part of their infertility work-up. Organ-dose values per radiograph and per minute of fluoroscopy were separately determined using an anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescence dosimetry. The radiogenic risk for deleterious effects on a possible future embryo and the radiogenic risk for cancer induction on the patient undergoing HSG were estimated. The average HSG procedure in our laboratory involves a mean fluoroscopic time of 0.3 min and a mean number of radiographs of 3.2. The dose to female gonads from an average HSG procedure was 2.7 mGy and the patient effective dose was 1.2 mSv. The risk for radiogenic anomalies in a future embryo of the woman undergoing an average HSG procedure and the risk for radiogenic fatal cancer induction in the exposed woman were estimated to be less than 10(-3) of the correspondent nominal risks. Radiation risks from a typical HSG are low, but they may be elevated if fluoroscopic and/or radiographic exposures are prolonged for any reason. Present data allow the estimation of radiogenic risks associated with HSG procedures performed in other laboratories with use of different equipment, screening time and number of radiographs taken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12835963     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1809-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  17 in total

1.  Unsuspected early pregnancy at hysterosalpingography.

Authors:  V H Jongen; J M Collins; J A Lubbers; M van Selm
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Hysterosalpingography: spectrum of normal variants and nonpathologic findings.

Authors:  B Ubeda; M Paraira; E Alert; R A Abuin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Radiation dose to the lens in sequential and spiral CT of the facial bones and sinuses.

Authors:  J Czechowski; J Janeczek; G Kelly; J Johansen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Effective dose in Albanian direct chest fluoroscopy.

Authors:  N W Marshall; G Shehu; D Marsh; K Faulkner; J Malone; K Dewhurst
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Interventional radiology in female infertility: technique and role.

Authors:  A J Maubon; M De Graef; M P Boncoeur-Martel; J P Rouanet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Long term safety of fluoroscopically guided selective salpingography and tubal catheterization.

Authors:  S Papaioannou; M Afnan; A Coomarasamy; B Ola; N Hammadieh; D H Temperton; J M McHugo; K Sharif
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Radiographic fallopian tube recanalization: absorbed ovarian radiation dose.

Authors:  P L Hedgpeth; A S Thurmond; R Fry; J R Schmidgall; J Rösch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Three-dimensional dynamic MR hysterosalpingography: a preliminary report.

Authors:  W Wiesner; S G Ruehm; G Bongartz; A Kaim; E Reese; C De Geyter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  What is the radiation exposure to patients during a gynecoradiologic procedure?

Authors:  V C Karande; D E Pratt; M S Balin; S G Levrant; R S Morris; N Gleicher
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Conceptus radiation dose and risk from chest screen-film radiography.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Kostas Perisinakis; Panos Prassopoulos; Evangelia Dimovasili; Haralambos Varveris; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

1.  Radiation exposure during videourodynamics in women.

Authors:  Ilias Giarenis; Jonathan Phillips; Heleni Mastoroudes; Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Cornelius Lewis; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The Impact of Preconceptional Hysterosalpingography with Oil-based Contrast on Maternal and Neonatal Iodine Status.

Authors:  Rongrong Li; Wei Chen; Yanping Liu; Liangkun Ma; Ling Qiu; Jianhua Han; Rui Li
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Cancer incidence risks to patients due to hysterosalpingography.

Authors:  Prince K Gyekye; Geoffrey Emi-Reynolds; Mary Boadu; Emmanuel O Darko; Johnson Yeboah; Stephen Inkoom; Cynthia K Mensah
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

4.  Value of "Three Dimensional Multidetector CT Hysterosalpingography" in Infertile Patients with Non-Contributory Hysterosalpingography: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shuchi Bhatt; Murtaza Sumbul; Rajpal Rajpal; Gita Radhakrishnan
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Assessment of Patient Absorbed Radiation Dose during Hysterosalpingography: A Pilot Study in Southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Achuka J A; Aweda M A; Usikalu M R; Aborisade C A
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.