OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the feasibility of opportunistic oral cancer and precancer screening in general dental practice and to determine the prevalence of relevant lesions and risk habits in a population of general dental practice attenders. DESIGN: A prospective demonstration study, recruiting patients opportunistically. SETTING: General dental practices. METHODS: Eighteen general dental practitioners took part in this study. Each attended training sessions to be advised of the study protocol and the criteria of a positive and negative screen. Patients over the age of 35 years were prospectively and opportunistically recruited. Each patient was asked to complete a health questionnaire concerning age, gender, ethnicity, smoking and drinking habits. The dentist then examined the soft tissues and recorded the presence or absence of lesions independently on a second form. The forms were collated and data were analysed to determine prevalence of lesions and associations with risk habits. RESULTS: Data on 2,265 patients were available for analysis. Oral lesions were detected in 319 patients (14.1%). Ninety-four patients (4.2%) had lesions considered to be either malignant or potentially malignant. There was a significant association between positive lesions and male gender(IRR 1.86, 95% CI 1.22-2.82), heavy smoking (males: IRR 3.68, 95% Cl2.10-6.43: female; IRR 3.58, 954b CI 1.35-9.50) and heavy alcohol use in males (IRR 2.98, 95%q CI 1.06-3.47). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients attending general dental practices are representative of the general population both in terms of lesion prevalence and high risk habits such as smoking and drinking. This supports the view that opportunistic screening in a general dental practice setting may be a realistic alternative to population screening. Further research is needed to determine the cost effectiveness of this approach and to investigate the value of targeting high risk groups within this population. General dental practice is ideal for the evaluation of such systems prior to extending these studies to other healthcare settings.
OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the feasibility of opportunistic oral cancer and precancer screening in general dental practice and to determine the prevalence of relevant lesions and risk habits in a population of general dental practice attenders. DESIGN: A prospective demonstration study, recruiting patients opportunistically. SETTING: General dental practices. METHODS: Eighteen general dental practitioners took part in this study. Each attended training sessions to be advised of the study protocol and the criteria of a positive and negative screen. Patients over the age of 35 years were prospectively and opportunistically recruited. Each patient was asked to complete a health questionnaire concerning age, gender, ethnicity, smoking and drinking habits. The dentist then examined the soft tissues and recorded the presence or absence of lesions independently on a second form. The forms were collated and data were analysed to determine prevalence of lesions and associations with risk habits. RESULTS: Data on 2,265 patients were available for analysis. Oral lesions were detected in 319 patients (14.1%). Ninety-four patients (4.2%) had lesions considered to be either malignant or potentially malignant. There was a significant association between positive lesions and male gender(IRR 1.86, 95% CI 1.22-2.82), heavy smoking (males: IRR 3.68, 95% Cl2.10-6.43: female; IRR 3.58, 954b CI 1.35-9.50) and heavy alcohol use in males (IRR 2.98, 95%q CI 1.06-3.47). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients attending general dental practices are representative of the general population both in terms of lesion prevalence and high risk habits such as smoking and drinking. This supports the view that opportunistic screening in a general dental practice setting may be a realistic alternative to population screening. Further research is needed to determine the cost effectiveness of this approach and to investigate the value of targeting high risk groups within this population. General dental practice is ideal for the evaluation of such systems prior to extending these studies to other healthcare settings.
Authors: Denise M Laronde; P M Williams; T G Hislop; Catherine Poh; Samson Ng; Lewei Zhang; Miriam P Rosin Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 3.383
Authors: Scott M Langevin; Dominique S Michaud; Melissa Eliot; Edward S Peters; Michael D McClean; Karl T Kelsey Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2012-09-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Walter J Psoter; Douglas E Morse; Melba Sánchez-Ayendez; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Maria L Aguilar; Carmen J Buxó-Martinez; Jodi A Psoter; Alexander R Kerr; Christina M Lane; Vincent J Scaringi; Augusto Elias Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.037