Literature DB >> 12835007

A demonstration of interval-censored survival analysis.

Brian R Radke1.   

Abstract

Interval-censoring occurs in survival analysis when the time until an event of interest is not known precisely (and instead, only is known to fall into a particular interval). Such censoring commonly is produced when periodic assessments (usually clinical or laboratory examinations) are used to assess if the event has occurred. My objectives were to raise awareness about interval-censoring including its existence, the potential ramifications of ignoring its existence, the different types of interval-censored data, and the analytical methods to analyze such data (including availability in standard statistical software). Asynchronous interval-censored survival analysis was demonstrated by parametric evaluation of risk factors for the time to first detected shedding of Salmonella muenster (identified by repeated periodic fecal cultures) for a herd of dairy cows. These results were compared with those from survival analyses which ignored or approximated the interval-censoring. Ignoring or approximating the asynchronous interval-censoring in the survival analysis generally resulted in the risk factors' regression coefficients having the same signs and a decrease (often >50%) in their absolute size. All the standard errors from the three methods of approximating the interval-censoring were <40% of their interval-censored counterparts. The conclusions drawn from the asynchronous interval-censored analysis versus those from the approximations varied dramatically. (The general conclusion from the approximations was that none of the risk factors for this example warranted further consideration.) That ignoring or approximating the left- and interval-censored nature of the dependent variable resulted in biased results was consistent with the literature. In the currently available asynchronous interval-censored models, the inclusion of time-dependent covariates that vary continuously is awkward. Statistical models for the semi-parametric estimation of asynchronous interval-censored survival analysis are not generally available in standard statistical software.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12835007     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(03)00103-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  10 in total

1.  Visit-to-Visit Variability of BP and CKD Outcomes: Results from the ALLHAT.

Authors:  Jeff Whittle; Amy I Lynch; Rikki M Tanner; Lara M Simpson; Barry R Davis; Mahboob Rahman; Paul K Whelton; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Statistical description for survival data.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 3.  Statistical issues and methods in designing and analyzing survival studies.

Authors:  Muditha Perera; Alok Kumar Dwivedi
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-05-09

4.  Salmonella fecal shedding and immune responses are dose- and serotype- dependent in pigs.

Authors:  Renata Ivanek; Julia Österberg; Raju Gautam; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Differences in intermittent and continuous fecal shedding patterns between natural and experimental Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infections in cattle.

Authors:  Rebecca M Mitchell; Ynte Schukken; Ad Koets; Maarten Weber; Douwe Bakker; Judy Stabel; Robert H Whitlock; Yoram Louzoun
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Modeling stream fish distributions using interval-censored detection times.

Authors:  Mário Ferreira; Ana Filipa Filipe; David C Bardos; Maria Filomena Magalhães; Pedro Beja
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Prevalence, Incidence, and Associated Factors of Possible Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Zi Chen; Mandy Ho; Pui Hing Chau
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 8.  Analytical Treatment Interruption in HIV Trials: Statistical and Study Design Considerations.

Authors:  Lu Zheng; Camlin Tierney; Ronald J Bosch
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.495

9.  Comparison of Cox proportional hazards regression and generalized Cox regression models applied in dementia risk prediction.

Authors:  Jantje Goerdten; Isabelle Carrière; Graciela Muniz-Terrera
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-14

10.  Validating the doubly weighted genetic risk score for the prediction of type 2 diabetes in the Lifelines and Estonian Biobank cohorts.

Authors:  Katri Pärna; Harold Snieder; Kristi Läll; Krista Fischer; Ilja Nolte
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 2.135

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.