Literature DB >> 12834836

Theoretical and experimental studies on freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit as methods to measure osmotic pressure of aqueous polyethylene glycol and bovine serum albumin solutions.

Keitaro Kiyosawa1.   

Abstract

For survival in adverse environments where there is drought, high salt concentration or low temperature, some plants seem to be able to synthesize biochemical compounds, including proteins, in response to changes in water activity or osmotic pressure. Measurement of the water activity or osmotic pressure of simple aqueous solutions has been based on freezing point depression or vapor pressure deficit. Measurement of the osmotic pressure of plants under water stress has been mainly based on vapor pressure deficit. However, differences have been noted for osmotic pressure values of aqueous polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions measured by freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit. For this paper, the physicochemical basis of freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit were first examined theoretically and then, the osmotic pressure of aqueous ethylene glycol and of PEG solutions were measured by both freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit in comparison with other aqueous solutions such as NaCl, KCl, CaCl(2), glucose, sucrose, raffinose, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) solutions. The results showed that: (1) freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit share theoretically the same physicochemical basis; (2) theoretically, they are proportional to the molal concentration of the aqueous solutions to be measured; (3) in practice, the osmotic pressure levels of aqueous NaCl, KCl, CaCl(2), glucose, sucrose, and raffinose solutions increase in proportion to their molal concentrations and there is little inconsistency between those measured by freezing point depression and vapor pressure deficit; (4) the osmotic pressure levels of aqueous ethylene glycol and PEG solutions measured by freezing point depression differed from the values measured by vapor pressure deficit; (5) the osmotic pressure of aqueous BSA solution measured by freezing point depression differed slightly from that measured by vapor pressure deficit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12834836     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(02)00365-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Chem        ISSN: 0301-4622            Impact factor:   2.352


  6 in total

1.  Manipulation of cell volume and membrane pore comparison following single cell permeabilization with 60- and 600-ns electric pulses.

Authors:  Olena M Nesin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-12-20

2.  In situ spectroscopic quantification of protein-ice interactions.

Authors:  Alan Twomey; Rebekah Less; Kosaku Kurata; Hiroshi Takamatsu; Alptekin Aksan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Osmolality of Excipients for Parenteral Formulation Measured by Freezing Point Depression and Vapor Pressure - A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Mariana Hugo Silva; Sarah P Hudson; Lidia Tajber; Matthieu Garin; Wenyu Dong; Tatsiana Khamiakova; René Holm
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Space and time in the plant cell wall: relationships between cell type, cell wall rheology and cell function.

Authors:  D S Thompson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Temporal kinetics of bovine mammary IgG secretion into colostrum and transition milk.

Authors:  Kasey M Schalich; Olivia M Reiff; Blake T Nguyen; Cassandra L Lamb; Cecilia R Mondoza; Vimal Selvaraj
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Plant Cell Wall Hydration and Plant Physiology: An Exploration of the Consequences of Direct Effects of Water Deficit on the Plant Cell Wall.

Authors:  David Stuart Thompson; Azharul Islam
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.