Literature DB >> 12834665

Medical therapy cost considerations for glaucoma.

Richard G Fiscella1, Amy Green, Daniel H Patuszynski, Jacob Wilensky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the calculated daily patient cost (cost minimization) of medical glaucoma therapy and review cost trends.
DESIGN: Experimental, controlled, prospective study.
METHODS: The actual volume of various glaucoma medications or glaucoma medications with redesigned bottles was determined for most commercially available sizes of the tested products. The drops per milliliter based on the actual volume and the daily costs of the dosage schedules recommended by the manufacturers were compared. The cost of each bottle of medication was determined from the average wholesale price (AWP) in the United States. A comparison to 1999 prices where applicable will be analyzed to review costing trends.
RESULTS: The generic timolol products (range, US dollars 0.38-US dollars 0.46 per day) were similar on a cost per day basis vs Betimol (Santen, Napa Valley, California, USA), Optipranolol (Bausch and Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Tampa, Florida, USA) and Timoptic (Merck, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA). Their percentage cost increase ranged from 5% to 22% since 1999, except for generic timolol XE gel-forming solution (48%). Betagan (Allergan, Irvine, California, USA), Betoptic S (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), and Ocupress (Novartis, Duluth, Georgia, USA) ranged from US dollars 0.88 to US dollars 1.11 per day, and their percentage cost increase ranged from 33% to 53%. Some brand-only products have raised their AWPs a greater percentage, including Betoptic S (37%), Iopidine (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) (50%), Ocupress (Novartis Ophthalmics, Duluth, Georgia, USA) (53%), and Pilopine gel (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) (32%). The mean cost per day for the topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors Azopt (Alcon Laboratories; US dollars 1.33 per day) and Trusopt (Merck; US dollars 1.05 per day) differed from 1999 when prices were almost identical. Cosopt (Merck; timolol 0.5% plus dorzolamide 2%, US dollars 1.04 per day) was less than the cost of separate bottles of a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor and a beta-blocker. The selective alpha-2 agonist brimonidine 0.15% with Purite (Alphagan-P, Allergan, 5 ml) twice daily was US dollars 1.29 per day. The prostaglandin analogs were comparably priced with Lumigan (Allergan) US dollars 0.95 per day, Xalatan (Pharmacia and Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) US dollars 1.25 per day, Travatan (Alcon Laboratories) US dollars 1.01 per day, and Rescula (Novartis) US dollars 0.90 per day.
CONCLUSIONS: All generic timolol, Betimol, Optipranolol, Timoptic, and Timoptic XE (Merck) ranged from US dollars 0.38 to US dollars 0.50 per day. Other beta-blocker products were about twice as costly, ranging from US dollars 0.88 to US dollars 1.11 per day. Cosopt (US dollars 1.05 per day) was less costly than separate bottles of a topical beta-blocker and a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dosed three times daily or twice daily. The prostaglandin analogs ranged from US dollars 0.90 per day (Rescula) to US dollars 1.25 per day (Xalatan). Newer glaucoma medications exhibit similar costs per day in many cases, compared with more traditional medications, especially with greater price increases in older brand-only products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12834665     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00102-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  28 in total

Review 1.  Prostaglandin analogues for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a systematic review of economic evidence.

Authors:  Michelle Orme; Annabel Boler
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  The economic burden of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: implications for patient management: a review.

Authors:  Jean-François Rouland; Gilles Berdeaux; Antoine Lafuma
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  The economic implications of glaucoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Michael T Halpern; Mechelle L Jones
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Considerations in glaucoma therapy: fixed combinations versus their component medications.

Authors:  Eve J Higginbotham
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-02

5.  Persistence on prostaglandin ocular hypotensive therapy: an assessment using medication possession and days covered on therapy.

Authors:  Gregory Reardon; Gail F Schwartz; Sameer Kotak
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  First-year treatment costs among new initiators of topical prostaglandin analogs.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; David W Covert; Alan L Robin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-16

7.  Variation in Number of Doses, Bottle Volume, and Calculated Yearly Cost of Generic and Branded Latanoprost for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Joanna H Queen; Robert M Feldman; David A Lee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Pharmacogenetics of ophthalmic topical beta-blockers.

Authors:  Duska J Sidjanin; Catherine A McCarty; Richard Patchett; Edward Smith; Russell A Wilke
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Estimating the rate of progressive visual field damage in those with open-angle glaucoma, from cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Aimee Teo Broman; Harry A Quigley; Sheila K West; Joanne Katz; Beatriz Munoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; James M Tielsch; David S Friedman; Jonathan Crowston; Hugh R Taylor; Rohit Varma; M Cristina Leske; Boel Bengtsson; Anders Heijl; Mingguang He; Paul J Foster
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Daily costs of prostaglandin analogues as monotherapy or in fixed combinations with timolol, in Denmark, Finland, Germany and Sweden.

Authors:  Anders Bergström; Frédérique Maurel; Claude Le Pen; Emilie Lamure; Michael Kent; Isabelle Bardoulat; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.