Literature DB >> 12834632

Research misconduct.

F J Gilbert1, A R Denison.   

Abstract

Good research practice is important to the scientific community. An awareness of what constitutes poor practice is important. Various types of research misconduct are defined in this article. The extent of research misconduct in the field of radiology has been assessed by contacting five English language radiology journals. Redundant or duplicate publication has been reported infrequently, Radiology (1), American Journal of Roentgenology (3), Clinical Radiology (3), British Journal of Radiology (2) and European Radiology (1). The issue of how the radiology community might tackle research misconduct is discussed with reference to guidance from the Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the Committee of Publication Ethics.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12834632     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00176-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  11 in total

Review 1.  Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish.

Authors:  Samir Al-Adawi; Badreldin H Ali; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-01

2.  Duplicate publication and 'paper inflation' in the Fractals literature.

Authors:  R N Kostoff; D Johnson; J A Del Rio; L A Bloomfield; M F Shlesinger; G Malpohl; H D Cortes
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The implications of fraud in medical and scientific research.

Authors:  Alistair A P Slesser; Yassar A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism.

Authors:  L S Kwok
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Morality, ethics, norms and research misconduct.

Authors:  Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Alexander Hemprich; Niels C Pausch
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-01

6.  Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior.

Authors:  Camilla J Rajah-Kanagasabai; Lynne D Roberts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-30

7.  Fraud and deceit in medical research.

Authors:  Umran Sarwar; Marios Nicolaou
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Facing to "duplicate submission" as a scientific misconduct.

Authors:  Seyyed Taha Yahyavi
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci       Date:  2014

9.  Research Misconduct: A Report from a Developing Country.

Authors:  Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan; Maliheh Dadgarmoghaddam
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  A decentralized framework for cultivating research lifecycle transparency.

Authors:  Wei Jeng; Shih-Hung Wang; Hung-Wei Chen; Po-Wei Huang; Yu-Jen Chen; Hsu-Chun Hsiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.