Literature DB >> 1283415

Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

B R Benacerraf1, D Neuberg, B Bromley, F D Frigoletto.   

Abstract

Current indications for cytogenetic evaluation leave the majority of Down syndrome fetuses undetected. Using advanced maternal age and low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels as criteria, only 40% of fetuses with Down syndrome (trisomy 21) are identified (positive predictive value, 0.4% to 1%). We evaluate the sonographically detectable physical features of second trimester fetuses to determine whether these features are more sensitive and specific than maternal age for detecting fetuses with abnormal karyotypes. From March 1, 1990, to September 1, 1991, more than 5,000 fetuses between 14 and 20 weeks of development were referred for genetic amniocentesis because of advanced maternal age or abnormal AFP levels. Forty-three of these 5,000 fetuses were later found to have autosomal trisomies by karyotype (32 with trisomy 21, nine with trisomy 18, and two with trisomy 13). A sample of 588 consecutive normal fetuses from the total of more than 5,000 amniocenteses performed during this period of time was used as our control group for statistical analysis. The sonographic features of these 588 normal second trimester fetuses and the 43 trisomic fetuses recorded prospectively prior to knowledge of the karyotype were evaluated statistically. The femur and humerus lengths, nuchal fold, renal pelvic dimension, and major structural defects were compared in the normal and trisomic fetuses. On the basis of our results, a weighted sonographic score was developed to optimize the detection of fetuses at risk for aneuploidy. Using our previously published formulas and criteria for a short femur and humerus, 17/32 (53%) fetuses with Down syndrome and 23/588 (3.9%) of the normal fetuses were identified. Twenty two of 32 Down syndrome fetuses (69%) and 2/588 (0.34%) of normals had a nuchal fold > or = 6 mm, and 11 of 32 Down syndrome fetuses and all those with trisomies 18 and 13 had a major anomaly detected sonographically. The following scoring system was developed for the detection of aneuploidy: nuchal fold = 2, major structural defect = 2, and short femur, short humerus, and pyelectasis = 1 each. Selecting fetuses with a score of > or = 2 would identify 26/32 (81%) Down syndrome fetuses, and 9/9 (100%) and 2/2 (100%) fetuses with trisomies 18 and 13 respectively, but only 26/588 (4.4%) of the normal fetuses. Using the sonographic score of 2 results in a positive predictive value for a 1/250 risk group of 6.87% for identifying Down syndrome fetuses and 7.25% for all three trisomies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1283415     DOI: 10.7863/jum.1992.11.9.449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  10 in total

1.  Prenatal Aneuploidies Computerized Screening (SCA TEST): a pilot study on 1000 women.

Authors:  Alessandro Sacco; Claudio Coco; Lucia Mangiafico; Pietro Cignini; Alessandra Tiezzi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2007-10

Review 2.  Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?

Authors:  Sameer Raniga; P D Desai; Hetal Parikh
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-01-11

3.  A review of biochemical and ultrasound markers in the detection of down syndrome.

Authors:  Catherine C Peterson
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2006

4.  Update and Review: Maternal Serum Screening.

Authors:  K E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Prenatal diagnosis for paediatricians.

Authors:  Anne Summers
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Role of second-trimester genetic sonography after Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kjersti M Aagaard-Tillery; Fergal D Malone; David A Nyberg; T Flint Porter; Howard S Cuckle; Karin Fuchs; Lisa Sullivan; Christine H Comstock; George R Saade; Keith Eddleman; Susan Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Diana W Bianchi; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Influence of second-trimester ultrasound markers for Down syndrome in pregnant women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Mariza Rumi Kataguiri; Edward Araujo Júnior; Luiz Claudio Silva Bussamra; Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza; Antonio Fernandes Moron
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2014-03-25

8.  Clinical value of genetic analysis in prenatal diagnosis of short femur.

Authors:  Jialiu Liu; Linhuan Huang; Zhiming He; Shaobin Lin; Ye Wang; Yanmin Luo
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Threshold of nuchal translucency for the detection of chromosomal aberration: comparison of different cut-offs.

Authors:  Min-Hyoung Kim; Su-Hyun Park; Hye-Jin Cho; June-Seek Choi; Joo-Oh Kim; Hyun-Kyong Ahn; Joong-Sik Shin; Jung-Yeol Han; Moon-Young Kim; Jae-Hyug Yang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Assessment of Placental Stiffness Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography in Pregnant Women with Fetal Anomalies.

Authors:  Bircan Alan; Cemil Göya; Senem Tunç; Memik Teke; Salih Hattapoğlu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.