Literature DB >> 12834020

Psychobiology of facial attractiveness.

A Cellerino1.   

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed an upsurge of interest in the research on facial attractiveness. The development of computer graphics has allowed to objectively investigate the conserved features of attractive faces. Averageness, symmetry and sex-specific traits have been associated with attractiveness. The effect of averageness is exemplified by blending a set of real faces into a chimeric face. This composite is more attractive than most of the faces used to create it. Beautiful faces are not simply average faces, however. If the female-specific features of a female composite face are enhanced, the resulting face is perceived as more attractive than the composite. In particular, smaller than average chin, smaller than average nose and higher than average forehead, all are traits associated with female's attractiveness. These traits have been interpreted as signs of high estrogen/testosterone ratio and therefore cues of high fertility. However, these same traits are also a species-specific characteristic of Homo sapiens that differentiates it from other hominid species. Preference for caricature of human features could represent a relic of species recognition mechanisms. Female preferences for male faces proved to be more variable than male preferences for female faces. Different facial traits are preferred in the choice of short-term and long-term partners. Preference for short term depend on the hormonal status and changes across the menstrual cycle and is influenced by contraceptive hormonal treatment. Psychological factors are also important sources of variance: female preferences correlate with self-perceived attractiveness, status in a relationship and degree of gender-conformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12834020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  10 in total

Review 1.  Body dysmorphic disorder: some key issues for DSM-V.

Authors:  Katharine A Phillips; Sabine Wilhelm; Lorrin M Koran; Elizabeth R Didie; Brian A Fallon; Jamie Feusner; Dan J Stein
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.505

Review 2.  Cutaneous lesions of the nose.

Authors:  Michael Sand; Daniel Sand; Christina Thrandorf; Volker Paech; Peter Altmeyer; Falk G Bechara
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Influence of lower facial height changes on frontal facial attractiveness and perception of treatment need by lay people.

Authors:  Selin Kale Varlik; Evren Demirbaş; Metin Orhan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Frontal bone remodeling for gender reassignment of the male forehead: a gender-reassignment surgery.

Authors:  Johannes Franz Hoenig
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  The Influence of Social Network Content on the Perception of Smiles-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Martina Čalušić Šarac; Marko Jakovac
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  Adaptation effects to attractiveness of face photographs and art portraits are domain-specific.

Authors:  Gregor U Hayn-Leichsenring; Nadine Kloth; Stefan R Schweinberger; Christoph Redies
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-06-11

Review 7.  A systematic review of individual motivational factors in orthodontic treatment: facial attractiveness as the main motivational factor in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Lusine Samsonyanová; Zdenek Broukal
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-05-20

8.  Facial esthetics and the assignment of personality traits before and after orthognathic surgery rated on video clips.

Authors:  Klaus Sinko; Reinhold Jagsch; Claudio Drog; Wilhelm Mosgoeller; Arno Wutzl; Gabriele Millesi; Clemens Klug
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Facial Aesthetics in Young Adults after Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment over Five Decades.

Authors:  K Sinko; J Cede; R Jagsch; A L Strohmayr; A McKay; W Mosgoeller; C Klug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Perception of aesthetics and personality traits in orthognathic surgery patients: A comparison of still and moving images.

Authors:  Klaus Sinko; Ulrich S Tran; Arno Wutzl; Rudolf Seemann; Gabriele Millesi; Reinhold Jagsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.