Literature DB >> 12833546

Conserved residue clustering and protein structure prediction.

Ora Schueler-Furman1, David Baker.   

Abstract

Protein residues that are critical for structure and function are expected to be conserved throughout evolution. Here, we investigate the extent to which these conserved residues are clustered in three-dimensional protein structures. In 92% of the proteins in a data set of 79 proteins, the most conserved positions in multiple sequence alignments are significantly more clustered than randomly selected sets of positions. The comparison to random subsets is not necessarily appropriate, however, because the signal could be the result of differences in the amino acid composition of sets of conserved residues compared to random subsets (hydrophobic residues tend to be close together in the protein core), or differences in sequence separation of the residues in the different sets. In order to overcome these limits, we compare the degree of clustering of the conserved positions on the native structure and on alternative conformations generated by the de novo structure prediction method Rosetta. For 65% of the 79 proteins, the conserved residues are significantly more clustered in the native structure than in the alternative conformations, indicating that the clustering of conserved residues in protein structures goes beyond that expected purely from sequence locality and composition effects. The differences in the spatial distribution of conserved residues can be utilized in de novo protein structure prediction: We find that for 79% of the proteins, selection of the Rosetta generated conformations with the greatest clustering of the conserved residues significantly enriches the fraction of close-to-native structures. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12833546     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  29 in total

1.  Some fundamental aspects of building protein structures from fragment libraries.

Authors:  J Bradley Holmes; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Combinatorial reshaping of the Candida antarctica lipase A substrate pocket for enantioselectivity using an extremely condensed library.

Authors:  Anders G Sandström; Ylva Wikmark; Karin Engström; Jonas Nyhlén; Jan-E Bäckvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coevolution of a homing endonuclease and its host target sequence.

Authors:  Michelle Scalley-Kim; Audrey McConnell-Smith; Barry L Stoddard
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Mason Weems; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Influence of C-H...O interactions on the structural stability of β-lactamases.

Authors:  P Lavanya; Sudha Ramaiah; Anand Anbarasu
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 1.365

6.  Co-delivery of cell-wall-forming enzymes in the same vesicle for coordinated fungal cell wall formation.

Authors:  Martin Schuster; Magdalena Martin-Urdiroz; Yujiro Higuchi; Christian Hacker; Sreedhar Kilaru; Sarah J Gurr; Gero Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 17.745

7.  Epidermal growth factor receptors: function modulation by phosphorylation and glycosylation interplay.

Authors:  Afshan Kaleem; Ishtiaq Ahmad; Daniel C Hoessli; Evelyne Walker-Nasir; Muhammad Saleem; Abdul Rauf Shakoori
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation.

Authors:  Matan Kalman; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Structural and phylogenetic analysis of a conserved actinobacteria-specific protein (ASP1; SCO1997) from Streptomyces coelicolor.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Seiji Sugiman-Marangos; Murray S Junop; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-06-10

10.  Sequence and structural analysis of the chitinase insertion domain reveals two conserved motifs involved in chitin-binding.

Authors:  Hai Li; Lesley H Greene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.