Literature DB >> 12832366

Comparison of endocrine tests with respect to their predictive value on the outcome of ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF treatment: results of a prospective randomized study.

J Kwee1, M W Elting, R Schats, P D Bezemer, C B Lambalk, J Schoemaker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare endocrine tests [clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCT), exogenous FSH ovarian reserve test (EFORT) and basal FSH, basal estradiol (E(2)) and basal inhibin B as an integral part of all CCT and EFORT], with respect to their ability to estimate the stimulable cohort of follicles in the ovaries (ovarian capacity) and to analyse which test or combination of tests would give the best prediction of ovarian capacity.
METHODS: A total of 110 regularly menstruating patients, aged 18-39 years, participated in this prospective study, randomized by a computer-designed 4-block system study into two groups. Fifty-six patients underwent a CCT, and 54 patients underwent an EFORT. In all patients, the test was followed by an IVF treatment. The result of ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF treatment, expressed by the total number of follicles, was used as gold standard.
RESULTS: Univariate linear regression analysis showed that the best correlation with the number of follicles after ovarian hyperstimulation (Y) is found by the inhibin B increment (InhB incr.) in the EFORT (Y = 3.957 + 0.081 x InhB incr. (95% CI 0.061-0.101); r = 0.751; P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant contributing value of the variables basal FSH, E(2) increment of the EFORT and inhibin B increment to the basic model with the variable age. The best prediction of ovarian capacity (Y) was seen when E(2) increment and inhibin B increment were used simultaneously in a stepforward multiple regression prediction model [Y = 2.659 + 0.052 x InhB incr. (0.026-0.078) + 0.027 x E(2) incr. (95% CI 0.012-0.054); r = 0.796; P < 0.001]. The CCT could not be used in a prediction model.
CONCLUSIONS: The EFORT is the endocrine test which gives the best prediction of ovarian capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12832366     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Serum anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count as predictive markers of OHSS in ART cycles.

Authors:  Pelin Ocal; Sezai Sahmay; Meral Cetin; Tulay Irez; Onur Guralp; Ismail Cepni
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Basal serum testosterone levels correlate with ovarian response but do not predict pregnancy outcome in non-PCOS women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Bo Sun; Fang Wang; Jing Sun; Wenzhu Yu; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Association of basal serum androgen levels with ovarian response and ICSI cycle outcome.

Authors:  C Abide Yayla; E Ozkaya; S Kayatas Eser; I Sanverdi; B Devranoglu; T Kutlu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Evaluation of ovarian reserve in infertile patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Fırat Mutlu; Ahmet Erdem
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  Association of basal serum testosterone levels with ovarian response and in vitro fertilization outcome.

Authors:  Yingying Qin; Zhiyi Zhao; Mei Sun; Ling Geng; Li Che; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels as a predictor of the ovarian response and IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Min Hye Choi; Ji Hee Yoo; Hye Ok Kim; Sun Hwa Cha; Chan Woo Park; Kwang Moon Yang; In Ok Song; Mi Kyoung Koong; Inn Soo Kang
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2011-09-30

8.  Ovarian reserve assessment for infertility investigation.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; David Barreira Gomes Sobrinho; Andréa Duarte Damasceno Vieira; Manoela Porto Silva Resende; Antônio César Paes Barbosa; Adelino Amaral Silva; Hitomi Miura Nakagava
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-26

9.  Association of bioavailable inhibin B and oocyte yield in controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Rachel B Danis; Intira Sriprasert; Jacqueline R Ho; Lynda K McGinnis; Ajay Kumar; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-03-31

10.  Comparison of Ovarian volume and Antral follicle count with Endocrine tests for prediction of responsiveness in ovulation induction protocols.

Authors:  Atoosa Adibi; Farahnaz Mardanian; Somaye Hajiahmadi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2012-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.