Literature DB >> 12832154

In vitro-in vivo extrapolation: estimation of human serum concentrations of chemicals equivalent to cytotoxic concentrations in vitro.

Michael Gülden1, Hasso Seibert.   

Abstract

In the present study an extrapolation model for estimating serum concentrations of chemicals equivalent to in vitro effective concentrations is developed and applied to median cytotoxic concentrations (EC(50)) determined in vitro. Nominal concentrations of a chemical in serum and in vitro are regarded as equivalent, if they result in the same aqueous concentration of the unbound form. The algorithm used is based on equilibrium distribution and requires albumin binding data, the octanol-water partition coefficient (K(ow)), and the albumin concentrations and lipid volume fractions in vitro and in serum. The chemicals studied cover wide ranges of cytotoxic potency (EC(50): 2.5-530,000 microM) and lipophilicity (logK(ow): -5 to 7). Their albumin binding characteristics have been determined by means of an in vitro cytotoxicity test as described previously. The equivalent serum concentrations of 19 of the 33 compounds investigated, having high protein binding and/or lipophilicity, were substantially higher than the EC(50)-values, by factors of 2.5-58. Prominent deviations between the equivalent nominal concentrations in serum and in vitro were largely restricted to chemicals with higher cytotoxic potency (EC(50)< or =1000 microM). The results suggest that estimates of equivalent serum concentrations based on in vitro data are robust for chemicals with low lipophilicity (logK(ow)< or =2) and low potency (EC(50)>1000 microM). With more potent chemicals or those with higher lipophilicity partitioning into lipids and/or binding to serum proteins have to be taken into account when estimating in vivo serum concentrations equivalent to in vitro effective concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12832154     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00146-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  14 in total

1.  Evaluating In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Toxicokinetics.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Michael F Hughes; Caroline L Ring; Denise K MacMillan; Jermaine Ford; Timothy R Fennell; Sherry R Black; Rodney W Snyder; Nisha S Sipes; Barbara A Wetmore; Joost Westerhout; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert G Pearce; Jane Ellen Simmons; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  In vitro-in silico-based analysis of the dose-dependent in vivo oestrogenicity of the soy phytoestrogen genistein in humans.

Authors:  Rungnapa Boonpawa; Albertus Spenkelink; Ans Punt; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Cytotoxic mechanisms of doxorubicin at clinically relevant concentrations in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Rachel E Nicoletto; Clyde M Ofner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Atropselective Partitioning of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in a HepG2 Cell Culture System: Experimental and Modeling Results.

Authors:  Chun-Yun Zhang; Susanne Flor; Gabriele Ludewig; Hans-Joachim Lehmler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach.

Authors:  Anne K Krug; Raivo Kolde; John A Gaspar; Eugen Rempel; Nina V Balmer; Kesavan Meganathan; Kinga Vojnits; Mathurin Baquié; Tanja Waldmann; Roberto Ensenat-Waser; Smita Jagtap; Richard M Evans; Stephanie Julien; Hedi Peterson; Dimitra Zagoura; Suzanne Kadereit; Daniel Gerhard; Isaia Sotiriadou; Michael Heke; Karthick Natarajan; Margit Henry; Johannes Winkler; Rosemarie Marchan; Luc Stoppini; Sieto Bosgra; Joost Westerhout; Miriam Verwei; Jaak Vilo; Andreas Kortenkamp; Jürgen Hescheler; Ludwig Hothorn; Susanne Bremer; Christoph van Thriel; Karl-Heinz Krause; Jan G Hengstler; Jörg Rahnenführer; Marcel Leist; Agapios Sachinidis
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Moles of a Substance per Cell Is a Highly Informative Dosing Metric in Cell Culture.

Authors:  Claire M Doskey; Thomas J van 't Erve; Brett A Wagner; Garry R Buettner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fingerprinting of neurotoxic compounds using a mouse embryonic stem cell dual luminescence reporter assay.

Authors:  Marilena Colaianna; Sten Ilmjärv; Hedi Peterson; Ilse Kern; Stephanie Julien; Mathurin Baquié; Giorgia Pallocca; Sieto Bosgra; Agapios Sachinidis; Jan G Hengstler; Marcel Leist; Karl-Heinz Krause
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Integrating in vitro data and physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling to assess the in vivo potential developmental toxicity of a series of phenols.

Authors:  Marije Strikwold; Bert Spenkelink; Laura H J de Haan; Ruud A Woutersen; Ans Punt; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Combining In Vitro Data and Physiologically Based Kinetic Modeling Facilitates Reverse Dosimetry to Define In Vivo Dose-Response Curves for Bixin- and Crocetin-Induced Activation of PPARγ in Humans.

Authors:  Suparmi Suparmi; Laura de Haan; Albertus Spenkelink; Jochem Louisse; Karsten Beekmann; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 10.  Invited review: human air-liquid-interface organotypic airway tissue models derived from primary tracheobronchial epithelial cells-overview and perspectives.

Authors:  Xuefei Cao; Jayme P Coyle; Rui Xiong; Yiying Wang; Robert H Heflich; Baiping Ren; William M Gwinn; Patrick Hayden; Liying Rojanasakul
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.