Literature DB >> 12831090

UK guidelines for use of erythromycin chemoprophylaxis in persons exposed to pertussis.

H Dodhia1, N S Crowcroft, J C Bramley, E Miller.   

Abstract

Pertussis is well controlled in the UK as a result of an effective vaccination programme. Nevertheless, the disease has not been eliminated, and cases still occur in the most vulnerable group of young infants. Erythromycin chemoprophylaxis has been advocated for use in contacts to prevent secondary cases but the evidence for its use is weak. These guidelines are based on a review of the evidence and aim to help clinicians make more rational decisions on the use of erythromycin chemoprophylaxis for pertussis. Erythromycin has well-established side effects and so its use should be limited to situations where it is likely to be of greatest benefit. If a clinically suspected or confirmed case of pertussis is identified who is also in household contact with someone at greatest risk from pertussis--young infants, especially neonates--then erythromycin chemoprophylaxis should be considered. The aim is to protect those at greatest risk from pertussis by offering chemoprophylaxis to them, to all their household contacts who are unimmunized and to contacts who are 5 years or older if they did not receive a pre-school pertussis booster (not given to those born before 1996 in the United Kingdom). There is no evidence of any benefit from chemoprophylaxis given more than 21 days from the date of onset of the primary case. Unimmunized or partially immunized cases and contacts should complete their course of vaccine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12831090     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/24.3.200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  7 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of historical and recent clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis in the United Kingdom using the Etest method.

Authors:  N K Fry; J Duncan; L Vaghji; R C George; T G Harrison
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of pertussis.

Authors:  Alberto E Tozzi; Lucia Pastore Celentano; Marta Luisa Ciofi degli Atti; Stefania Salmaso
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Pertussis post-exposure prophylaxis among household contacts: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Nisha Thampi; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Natasha S Crowcroft; Beate Sander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors influencing the spread of pertussis in households: a prospective study, Catalonia and Navarre, Spain, 2012 to 2013.

Authors:  Pere Godoy; Manuel García-Cenoz; Diana Toledo; Glòria Carmona; Joan A Caylà; Miquel Alsedà; Josep Àlvarez; Irene Barrabeig; Neus Camps; Pere Plans; María Company; Jesús Castilla; Maria-Rosa Sala-Farré; Carmen Muñoz-Almagro; Cristina Rius; Àngela Domínguez
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-11-10

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of single IgA and IgG antibody concentrations for early diagnosis of pertussis in adults: an evaluation for outbreak management in public health practice.

Authors:  Paul L J M Mertens; Frans S Stals; Ewout W Steyerberg; Jan H Richardus
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 6.  What is new in pertussis?

Authors:  Ellen S Bamberger; Isaac Srugo
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Azithromycin to Prevent Pertussis in Household Contacts, Catalonia and Navarre, Spain, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Josep Alvarez; Pere Godoy; Pedro Plans-Rubio; Neus Camps; Monica Carol; Gloria Carmona; Ruben Solano; Cristina Rius; Sofia Minguell; Irene Barrabeig; Maria R Sala-Farré; Raquel Rodriguez; Manuel Garcia-Cenoz; Carmen Muñoz-Almagro; Angela Dominguez
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 6.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.