Literature DB >> 12829870

For severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation prior to carotid endarterectomy is unnecessary: the argument against.

Peter M Rothwell1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12829870     DOI： 10.1161/01.STR.0000079176.04043.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN： 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Measurement error of percent diameter carotid stenosis determined by conventional angiography: implications for noninvasive evaluation.

Authors:  Joseph E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Marja Berg; Zishu Zhang; Aki Ikonen; Petri Sipola; Reetta Kälviäinen; Hannu Manninen; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.

Authors:  M Lell; C Fellner; U Baum; T Hothorn; R Steiner; W Lang; W Bautz; F A Fellner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.